It depends on the issue. I think she genuinely is opposed to her Dad’s stance on the environment.
It depends on the issue. I think she genuinely is opposed to her Dad’s stance on the environment.
Which is what distinguishes her from Chelsea.
Well, they were good enough at it to win the election.
Maybe if you used more profanity I’d find your “argument” persuasive.
You seem like a really bright one. Truly.
Then I take it you will stand on principle and refuse to take any medicines developed as a result of it, right? You’re that steadfast in your beliefs?
She was a terrible candidate. You can try and explain that away all you want, but she lost because she was a terrible candidate.
Worked out really well for you in the end, didn’t it?
Yes. As stated, you believe that healthcare is a “right” and you should get it for free.
Great! I hope you vote “in your jurisdiction” to pay all your income in taxes. Like I said, knock yourself out. I’ll pass.
If you want it otherwise, all you have to do is pay more taxes to provide higher incomes to government employees. Knock yourself out. I’ll take a pass on that, thanks.
Exactly. You believe healthcare is a right and you should get it for free.
So Hillary’s President then, right?
Well, lots of poor white people did as well. As did people in the $50k - $100k income range, which is not “rich” in my book. In fact, if you look at voting trends by income, Hillary and Trump were neck and neck.
Did you know that well over 90% (some studies are as high as 97%) of all drugs manufactured are manufactured for one purpose? That purpose is to sell them in the United States. Other countries piggy-back on our drug manufacturing base. Believe it or not, but those industries hire tons of people, create tons of…
You never said “free health care” at all but that’s exactly what you want and think you deserve.
I think it’s still a prime cause of bankruptcy. This blog explains why better than I can:
It’s an option, but not a good one.
No offense, dude, but firing off shitty comments like that may be what causes you to need meds in the first place. V-Jones’ comment is spot on.
To be fair, if all meds had generic equivalents available earlier, then manufacturers wouldn’t create the drugs in the first place because the profit motive would disappear.