darnray
darnray
darnray

Deliberating starting to kill each other, maybe.

I would imagine that with any sequestered jury, they plan outings for them that require chaperones. If it hadn't been mani/pedis, it would have been something else. Occasional distraction is necessary to keep a clear head—I mean, is a jury going to sit there and think about the case 24/7 for the duration of the trial?

All interesting points, and I would be curious to know if they take steps on public outings to avoid exposure to random comments and news outlets. For instance, did they get a private room at Outback? Did they book out the nail salon or go when it would normally be closed, etc? I would hope that they take some

OK, little contact—still not easy. Main point stands: was it out of line with what is normally done for sequestered jurors? That would be a story. This is just sh*t stirring.

I saw World War Z, and it was actually really good! In a summer popcorn movie kind of way. Lone Ranger, yes.

Want me to get mad about this? Show me that this treatment went above and beyond what would be "normal" for a sequestered jury, and we'll see if I can muster up some outrage for you. Being sequestered must be incredibly stressful—no contact with the outside world for 22 days is a long time. The state needs to do

Not sure why I keep responding...sigh. I get to believe whatever I want—I'm not challenging the legality of the results of the trail (which I said earlier). I said all of this before: it is possible that Zimmerman is skewing his account to make himself look better. It is also possible that his memory of what happened

"Martin unilaterally escalated to violence?" I refer you to my very first comment: were you there? No one will ever know exactly how this went down, as you have admitted above. And we will never agree. You believe Zimmerman's account=fact. I do not. I believe Zimmerman bears responsibility for the whole thing since he

Well, therein lies our difference: from what I can tell, Zimmerman made a series of bad decisions that ultimately led to Martin's death. If he had listened to the police dispatcher's directive to not follow Martin in the first place, nothing would have happened. But he didn't, he overstepped and put into motion a

I can't say what I would have done if I was a member of that jury—I wasn't there, but you can only rule according the the case that's presented. And it seems that the badly botched prosecution made their decision clear.

I am saying that it's wrong to act as if the details of this tragic altercation are indisputable fact.

True, true.

Did you see Martin "ambush" Zimmerman and attempt to take his gun from him? Just wondering. 'Cause I thought there weren't any witnesses...

LOL. Well, you clearly aren't very familiar with the Mail and their widely used nickname, so I'm not sure what to say there.

You went real? Well, then, I apologize—I didn't realize you were at the wedding and know exactly what happened. All I saw was a paparazzi picture of Sidibe in a wedding dress and a reference to what the Daily Fail "thinks" the prank might have been. So, you know, conjecture.

I just don't automatically go to the most negative place possible right off the bat, is all.

I get what you are saying, but you're assuming that there's no personal relationship between Kimmel and Sidibe...and the bride, for that matter. It's possible that this was all a big play on a inside joke between the group of them based on something else they experienced together during their friendship. I don't know

I'm not sure what the process is, but I don't think that legal clearances for song names are necessary since they are considered "art." Think about all the songs that name-check brands....or are exact repeats of songs that have been done before.

See, I can totally envision Affleck playing the failed golden boy.

I think he was more of a cad.