Good job posting this right after the Poldark post:

:(

Setting yourself up to get into a standard career and get an employer to give you a salary isn’t the only way to make money and it definitely isn’t a guarantee you’ll be making a lot of it. Capitalizing on trends, taking risks and doing something not a lot of people do sometimes pays off better than the alternative.

Because at the end of the day, after any amount of good posts, they like to throw in an overly dramatic article for clicks. This is the Gawker family after all.

I’ve been waiting for this game since 2001 and it’s obvious that’s just a quick placeholder image. I don’t see why any rational person would be deterred by it when you have Yu Suzuki’s previous work to go off of.

Next time, on GB Burford’s article titles.....

Boy, you sure proved him right by focusing on GamerGate rather than his game in 90% of the article.

I was also curious about what makes Vávra tick. I’d only seen him from afar, in figurative armor. I’d spotted him as a pugnacious user of Twitter who would mix Tweets about game design with angry complaints about so-called social justice warriors and charges that, as he put it last October, “the future of our biz is…

Anybody getting their GamerGate news from Kotaku is basically asking Bill Clinton about a certain intern... The bias is written in the story. (Not a nock against Stephen really, he was pretty neutral.)

Only to pull off a survivor style betrayal at the next tribal council meeting.

She has clothes on...

Well, you know... if you had waited until you finished playing the main story to write this article... you wouldn’t have written this article.

That made my day.

People aren’t supporting it because it has a Confederate flag in it. They are supporting it because the game got F’d over by Apple.

Maybe they are supporting it because it’s a good game that was taken down for no good reason outside of knee-jerk PCism?

I get that they’re a private company and reserve the right to control what gets put up in their store, but man, this is some creepy Holocaust denial shit right here.

So, Valve should be responsible for people’s inability to finish, or even play, the games they own?

How does it not matter? I come here for video games not for crying about race

I don't normally like to play the "maybe your just bad at the game" card, but spending 4-5 hours on a single segment somewhat forces my hand.

There are some valid points in this review, but I disagree with the part about the Dracula in the older Castlevania games being interesting. I'm not sure which games you were playing, but pretty much ever Castlevania with the POSSIBLE exception of Lament of Innocence didn't develop Dracula in the slightest. The most…