a reasonable scale is fine

I think it’s well-spent if it draws more people to the device—iPhones are stupid popular among young people, and emoji are as smart of an area to innovate in as any for that demo. (Something over 75% of teens have iPhones, can that be right? https://www.macrumors.com/2017/10/11/teen-iphone-survey-fall-2017/)

Huawei’s the leading maker of cellular infrastructure in the world. It’s a little late to be paranoid about them.

Apple really screws people on this. It’s so anti-consumer, it’s ridiculous.

The grass is quite a bit greener, literally, since you’ll save money buying something other than Apple.

Cynical much? I really liked Shoe Dog. Also, sure, Pre may have died wearing Nikes (never heard that particular detail), but you make it sound like the shoes were somehow responsible for his untimely demise.

and won’t require you to take a week off of work to watch it.

and won’t require you to take a week off of work to watch it.

Project Fi is freaking incredible. I switched to Sprint for unlimited data, which is nice, but Fi was so good I almost regret it.

Obviously Apple doesn’t want anyone to think of any of their phones as minor upgrades, so I think you answered your own question.

$1,350 with AppleCare, if you worry an all-glass front and back might be fragile.

How long do you think it takes to make an email rule?

I have a 2014 MacBook Pro 13 that still is totally fine for me.

I started using this browser on my Nexus 5X months ago. It’s terrific. I can’t honestly say it or Chrome is any better than the other, and the plug-ins (I had an ad-blocker) might put Samsung’s over the top.

Do people really wait for OS updates to get wallpapers? Can’t tell if this post is tongue-in-cheek or I’m just really out of touch.

if anyone’s as confused as I was, the link clarifies the typo above: a 65" TV has 40% more area than a 55", not 40" more.

if anyone’s as confused as I was, the link clarifies the typo above: a 65" TV has 40% more area than a 55", not 40"…

If Superman can be a Brit, Bond can be an American.

Memory is fixed in MacBooks, maybe, but I wouldn’t say most laptops. I haven’t felt CPU-constrained by a browser in years and years—and like I said, desktop apps have the same problem anyway—but maybe I’m lucky.

Chrome and Firefox are horrible CPU and memory hogs. They often crash or need to be closed. This makes all your work unavailable until you reload all your tabs.

I doubt he meant to be taken quite so literally.

Why shouldn’t a court ruling ignore the way the internet works? If a nation has a privacy law, why should that law be expected to accommodate or exempt a for-profit entity because of how that company operates within a technical network design?