Yeah, a retconned Sarah Palmer being some sort of demon—that makes any sort of narrative or chronological or even thematic sense. *stomp, stomp, stomp all over the original series*

Should never been called 'Twin Peaks'. Shoulda been called 'Single Peak: The Adventures of Dougie Magoo'.

The mystery asked a question; I wanted that question answered. The network answered that question and I still watched until the end. THen I re-watched. And re-watched.

I'm a nerd, and I still think these nerds are nerds.

This is utter crap. Two of my heroes from.when I was younger: Driest Do'Urden, a dark-skinned drow that over ones prejudice to be a man in his own right; and Sparrowhawk, a brown-faced wizard who bites off more than he can chew and suffers the consequences.

Psychodaaaad. Psychodad. Psychodad!

Not enough Tim Curry.

Did not read what you've read into this. Just because hr legs are slightly askew doesn't mean she's peeing fire. You sickos.

The original, Australian version of 'Review' is boss. You may not get it though.

Please don't give this man a Marvel movie. Not every good up-and-coming director has to fall down the superhero-downward-spiral. Let him make films with social content that hold a broken mirror up to society.

Two corrections:
- Melanie was not the one who said 'I don't think they're memories'. It's clearly Syd.
- Episode 3 was not the first time they've seen the yellow-eyed demon. He's been popping up since the first ep. Or the reviewer could have meant 'his first appearance in this episode'. If so, boffo.

Many of you people have obviously never seen Samuel Becket's 'Waiting for Godot', wherein two characters debate their existence while waiting for Godot (who may or may not be God).

To be even fairer, Cornell fried his voice about 6-7 years back and tends to hold back on about 75% of his vocal performances now, ripping out the old magic for when he can handle it. Not as shiny as back in his golden years, but still worth hanging around for.

What if Rowling unintentionally did not include any gay characters, and it's simple as that? Or, looking at the fact the first couple of books were aimed at children, perhaps having overtly gay characters limited her book's chances of being published at certain publishers (some still view LGBT as niche). The first…

Disagree. 'Willow' remains an awesome fantasy story, even now. Most hero's journey movies and novels hit the same beats at approximately the same time, so I can't say it's a rip-off of anything more than the pre-established archetypal pattern.