Seriously, no one on staff picked the US Girl with the Dragon Tattoo trailer? For shame.

Sounds better than anything else NBC is running.

Whereever there is a bro in need, wherever beer pong is to be played but no one brought the beer, wherever strippers are left without skeezy men to ogle them, Marky Mark will appear.

…Are you sure you're responding to me, because I, in no, way said anything you're talking about… O_o

I worked at a radio station at the time as the Music Director (the dude in charge of the whole of the music library), and after the attacks happened they (management) elected to censor the music library using the Clear Channel recommendations (even though we were a college station in no way affiliated with Clear…

"Sky" because the terrorists used planes. That was the kind of "logical" association they were using.

The exit from the Coliseum? I think you meant some other room…

Not the Colbert one. That's obviously for charity. The Jeb! one, though, is all for his campaign. Campaign contributions aren't tax deductible because campaigns have to be a different kind of non-profit. This doesn't sound like a charity stunt — this is a lottery.

There's a prize, and chance, and money required to be entered in for that chance at the prize, so… how is this not an illegal lottery?

"He even convinced Charlize Theron to have sex with him in Prometheus by suggesting that only a robot would be immune to his charms. And, unlike other scenes in Prometheus, audiences went along with it."

Technically, while we didn't direct the third Nightmare movie, he was involved in the scripting (and it was based on his story). Worth mentioning since the article makes it sound like he left the series up until the seventh flick, New Nightmare.

So long as this movie doesn't take place in and around the events of the other three Damon movies, I'll be okay with this. I liked the other Damon flicks, but the timeline around all of them started to get really confusing.

Are you trying to make a clean break, or get more time with Roman soldiers-in-drag? If you realign your goal you may find you're doing _very_ well.

…yes? By the end of film production it's as much the director's as it is the writers. Hell, by the end of it, likely the Editor had more to say about the story than anyone else.

Yeah, and the director said it wasn't.

Ahhh, name calling. The highest form of discourse.

Much to the detriment of the genre.

It does matter. The two imply different horrors they are playing off of: (1) the creeping dread of an apocalypse crawling over you, inescapably, while your way of life that you knew slowly crumbles vs. (2) a fast, unending terror fest that goes quick and then dies out.

In historical instances of the fiction of the "zombie" they are the dead brought back to life. At no point in 28 Days Later (or it's sequel) do the people die then come back as rage-filled kill machines. They aren't zombies, or ghouls, or whatever other undead term people like to apply. They are rage-infected humans.

I'll allow that. Neither of them are a term you'd apply to the creatures in 28 Days Later.