Do you have any evidence for your claim that Iraq had WMDs, Baghdad just hid them in Syria? Yes or no. Do you have any evidence for that claim? It’s a simple enough question and it’s been asked enough times by now to see you deflecting by trying to change the subject to drone strikes when we’ve covered that one in…

I can rewrite the sentence to make it grammatically correct. What you can’t do is prove your contention, which is why you take a shot at someone leaving a verb out on a finicky phone - you have no argument otherwise. This is what you’re reduced to. This is how dominated you are.

One, pay the taxes. Two, if you have someone helping with your finances, make sure that they are paying the taxes and not just pocketing it all for themselves. Three, Iraq had WMDs, they just them in Syria and no, I have no evidence to back that up.

Yup. Now, pay attention when it comes to the “War” on terrorism:

Jokes like that won’t get you very far in Florida smart mouth. Or Alabama, Indiana, South Carolina, Iowa, Nevada, South Dakota, Arizona, Kansas, New Hamshire, Tennessee, Arkansas, Kentucky, New Jersey, Texas, California, Louisiana, Utah, Colorado, New York, Maryland, North Carolina, North Dakota, Michigan, Ohio, West…

Yup. The US supports 75% of the World’s authoritarian regimes, with Saudi Arabia being the largest sponsor of extremists in the World, according to our own State Department’s proscribed group list.

Yes, that’s what serious people will do.

Well as you say, all the initiatives you’re referring to for DEI are new. All of them. So I figure we won’t know until we know.

This is better, but it still only seems that the controversy here is about whether they can actually meet their own goals rather than whether they should actually try to.

58% of them still believe invading Iraq was the right thing to do, so I have my doubts.

https://archive.ph/fpI5y

I’d need to see more than just data from five universities in New Hampshire to see what the controversies are or their links to guaranteed future aircraft, engineering, and fire disasters though. It’s not a terribly convincing link.

Do they?

Why?

Fires break out, planes fall out of the sky, bridges collapse, cancer research gets bungled and the troops can’t run in countries which don’t have programs designed to expand access. And since 1967, has there been a notable uptick in fires breaking out, planes falling out of the sky, bridges collapsing, and the…

So: Fires, planes falling out of the sky, bridges collapsing, cancer research bungled, and the troops can’t run.

It depends on who you ask.

She hasn’t had a hit since he was in diapers, it’s been mostly pagesix material these past 15 years.

“If you’re against government surveillance, then you must be in favor of letting terrorists run rampant and harm innocent people. Are you sympathetic to terrorists?”

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/1/24/india-university-warns-against-screening-bbc-documentary-on-modi