Hard to say which part’s worse really.

There’s a reason it became a more common adjective roundabout approximately, September 12, 2001.

“I’ve got no problem with Black people being LGBTQ+”

I mean, it would be easy for you to say:

I stopped reading after that. Was the rest any good?

Omar’s rationale for not supporting the Russian oil ban is built on a very different rationale to her support of BDS to be compared properly. Her views on Russia (make the Hague work, and stick Russians in front of it for what they did in Bucha) are also too different from Dore’s (Bucha didn’t happen) to be compared…

on paper, someone like Taibbi cannot, I suppose, be explicitly labeled “right wing”.

Taibbi? He absolutely thinks the right is a threat -

Is it speculation or is it deduction though? These leaks may not be the work of GOP men he upset, but isn’t that possibility far more likely than any other one here? Given the timing of the leaks, and the site they were leaked to? The nature of them?

https://theanalysis.news/a-dangerous-moment-for-the-democratic-party-matt-taibbi/

It’s not disingenuous, it’s logical. If it isn’t 100%, what figure is it? 90? 87? Throw me a number here.

I didn’t see them, you edited your comment after I’d read it maybe.

What makes it rightward?

I’m not seeing that from his substack.

From the FBI down to the lowest ranking officer.

There’s a lot of pensioner Hoteps out there, so you’re probably right on that one.

https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Migration-and-Disease-in-Africa-during-European-F3E4ESYVJ

I’m not seeing them myself. People overestimate the extent to which sites like these are important enough for groups like those to even be aware of, much less spam.

Did anyone ask?