That’s exactly what they said in the Declaration! “Unalienable rights” is middle English for “benefits of American citizenship.” Know what it didn’t say? PROPERTY.
That’s exactly what they said in the Declaration! “Unalienable rights” is middle English for “benefits of American citizenship.” Know what it didn’t say? PROPERTY.
I paused to comment that this wasn’t as bad as I was expecting it to be, but then I realized that no force on earth could make me finish the video. So. Yeah.
Disagree—Brady’s more important to the team than Belichick.
I don’t care if changing the rule helps the Pats win another TEN super bowls (sorry, not exactly a fan), but at least I won’t feel like a crazy person watching every game in between.
And furthermore, Bortles was harassed throughout the second half so I’m not sure holding was as significant as on Brady’s side where he largely remained untouched. Hard to argue that an uncalled infraction that failed benefits a team more than one that succeeded in its intent. I could say more about how holding seems…
From the pertinent arguments I’ve seen the Pats simultaneously are just coached to not commit penalties but are also penalized just as much as any other team, so which is it? Do they get called as much and just turn up the discipline in the playoffs or do they not get called as much and it is a question of game to…