i dont even like harry potter but this game looks awesome. Cant wait to get home and play after work

So, you just stopped after the intro because you didn’t like it? That seems a bit unfair. The intro accomplishes the two main things it sets out to do:

This is a weirdly hateful article. You can describe what you like without sounding like a spiteful whiner. 

God this is atrocious “criticism” of the type where simply identification of a trope somehow equals bad storytelling. Did the writer get his education about film from cinemasins? And why start off an article about a game by admitting you don’t even know when it was released and didn’t have enough initiative to simply…

Seems like I’m not going to be playing Suicide Squad. 

you think that way because you only see games as disposable entertainment 

Alternate currencies in games need to be illegal. There is literally no benefit, it exists only to manipulate people and confuse how much your spending.

“...except it’s not creating unique stuff, because AI “art” is completely dependent on having pre-existing art in its database to copy from...”  Any artist who has exprienced sensation does this.  The entire concept of developing artistic minds is founded in the principle of identification, study, and repetition. …

No “technology” should ever be allowed to replace a real live person’s ability to make money.  Just think where would all the town-criers be if we let a pesky thing like the newspaper get off the ground.

If you know how reality works, you’d realize nothing is unique.

There is no such thing as a “new” idea. Everything is derived from something else. There are no directors who have never watched films. No writers who have never read books. No artists who have never viewed the art of others. Everything we create is inspired and informed by previous creations. AI just automates that…

Glad someone in this comment section has their head screwed on right.

This is always going to be a super problematic argument because what critics of AI art don’t want to admit is that human artists train themselves on vast amounts of copyrighted work with “no consent, no credit, and no compensation”. There are thousands of artists who have learned to ape other artists styles, and based…

If it's creating unique stuff not out there then they are just jealous an AI could replace their jobs

The whole “if you give your money to someone you are responsible for their views” thing is just... ridiculously naive. If anyone believes that, you shouldn’t be on this website, because The Herb and crew still reap any rewards from this site’s success. It’s a sad fact of the world that 90% of all money you spend is,…

‘anyone who pledges to support her monetarily is also a transphobe’ and comments like that, where people say ‘you’re x if you y’, immediately draw my ire. Give me a reason that’s substantiated, not a threat of your perception of me shifting.

The writer of this article literally copy and pasted other people's words and pictures to make this article. Without those people's consent. By the logic of the anti-AI crowd, this constitutes theft, the writer should be fired, and Kotaku should disallow ANY article that use other peoples words and images.

Buncha babies.

This is amusing. Essentially, theses artists are documenting their outrage with AI’s ethical and legal questions by focusing on its current shortcomings, which is fair game. But given how quickly the tech is evolving, I wonder if a kid who sees some of this specific anti AI art art will have a clue where it came…

Fucking grow up.