danknowsnukes--disqus
Dan_Knows_Nukes
danknowsnukes--disqus

You are using a self proclaimed antinuclear reference. Why don't you just look at the  points made in the movie, research from neutral sources, and decide for yourself? 

This is an interesting take. But aren't there also institutional incentives to prevent accidents, seeing as they are a huge cost to the operator? Or don't airplane operators have the same 'disincentives' yet we fly all the time. But based on history, the probability of death in air travel is much greater than the

Good point Dr. Rumak. It proves that we are all subject to  misconceptions when the unknown or lesser known is involved. I would never claim to be immune to that.

Your are right. No energy is completely green. Mining for materials is done for windmills and solar cells as well. The energy and materials put into any energy technology, from construction, to fuels, to maintenance and cleaning, are some percentage of the total cost and impact. Those get ignored too often, so I am

I would gladly live next door to a Nuclear plant. I would be much more hesitant to live next to a farm (pesticides), and chemical factory, a coal plant (air quality), a shopping mall (oil, gas leakage, trash, noise), or most any industrial facility.  I would definitely not want to live near the plants that make

From the review  'would still be best watched in the presence of a panel of physicists,
who could then confirm, disconfirm, or complicate each point.".