What a coincidence... Terrible games journalist wear sunglasses too.

Things we need government oversight on: People commenting on the internet.

Things we don’t need government oversight on: People purchasing guns specifically designed to kill as many people as possible as quickly as possible.

Fucking way to fucking go.

This seems to only apply to loot boxes and specifically to paid loot boxes. I don’t think non-paid randomized drop mechanics will be affected.

This is for loot boxes bought with real money not for games that random rolls on items earned while playing.

I just want to be clear - are you asking if this will mean that every treasure chest inside the game itself contains the exact same thing every time? Like the same number of gold pieces, same weapons and armor? This is the question you are asking?

Since when has the main Elder Scrolls series had random loot? Besides some common items, you know what you’re getting every time you kill a certain character. The level of the item might be affected by the player’s level, but that’s not a random mechanic.

Errr... it specifically says paid loot drop boxes in the second paragraph without respect to whether a game is single or multiplayer.

If you were regularly playing someone before you opened up chests in Skyrim, Oblivion, or Morrowind, I have some bad news ...

Where are you reading that this will bring about the end of random loot?

You got a weird definition of 1:1 copies I’d say maybe that Deep Purple one is the closest. The one you cited doesn’t really sound close. 

So first it’s “Two statues in The Division 2 appear to be having sex”, and now it’s “McDonald’s cups look like people having sex”.

Literally not a single one of those pictures looked like a person having sex. One was maybe an above pants crotch kiss, and an above pants dick rub. Then there was one with a guy spinning a girl around. Yeah, I didn’t see any sex going on there.

WAIT A MINUTE... do you not know what sex is?

JK.

Fair Use of a copyrighted work requires that the use be “transformative” in some way. So you can’t just, for instance, upload The Lion King to Youtube and claim Fair Use because that’s not transformative... that’s just piracy.

How is this any different than growing a human ear off a mouse?

What do you mean Warren had “very little time to speak”??

Pinky, are you pondering what I’m pondering?

Now this I can agree with, this is a decent argument, rather than the shitty “it’s just comfortable, not meant for others eyes” argument which is just total bs. 

Personally I’d like to wear pants where my balls and tip of my dick slightly peak out. For comfort...

No one is pretending otherwise. Just because they choose to attract viewers that way doesn’t mean it’s ok to call them “sluts” or whatever synonymous pejoratives their harassers come up with. It’s their choice. They’re allowed to do it. People should just ignore it and not watch their streams if they don’t like it. 

So. Like. Let’s be real. Online harassment isn’t okay. That’s a fact. Name calling isn’t okay either. Calling a woman a slut because she wears low cut tops is just dumb.