danjalveskandar
Danjal Veskandar
danjalveskandar

Because jumping puzzle sounds better than obstacle course.

A lesson that some gamers (including myself) need to learn and take to heart.

It’s a matter of asking yourself which is more important.

Aye, sell value for money.

As opposed to what? Ignoring how the devs bring out one reason for a development decision, then turn around and contradict that reason with another development decision?

Because bite-sized consumergrade snips is where it’s at these days.

Pokémon devs: “We can’t put in the full dex, because it’d be too demanding considering the higher graphic fidelity from the new hardware.”

A civilized response would be to not buy the game currently offered exclusively through a storefront you don’t support. And perhaps informing the developer of this in a polite and civilized manner.

Developer receiving death threats relates to legitimate criticism of anything how?

You are free to choose.

It’s a mixed bag really. Some of the concerns are well-founded.

The focus on video games is the strongest bait-and-switch the Republicans and pro-gun nuts have in their wheelhouse. It’ll IMMEDIATELY distract people from the actual problem at hand, and has the secondary benefit that it’ll fracture an otherwise united front that cares to deal with that underlying problem. Making

This is really neat.

The whole point is that if someone wants to make money off of it? It can’t remain private.

And the monetization schemes that EA would want to implement - they couldn’t get those past Nintendo’s approval.

I’ve been watching someone play, and while yes. The down does get attacked regularly. He has found multiple solutions already to deal with the attacks to the point that he quite literally idled through multiple of them without negative repercussions.

Weapon skins yes, unless things changed in recent years? They have never sold actual weapons that give different stats than those you can obtain through regular play without spending money.

While I definitely agree with the sentiments.

Because it’s not necessarily a good idea to have video of that floating around that other people can then run with and do whatever they want with.

True, but there are definite implications of being on stream.