HAHA that quote, like the argument is a thing of perspective.

I am not grasping at straws I am simply defending what judgmental procedure should be right.

I hope pandas have huge weiners..

Well I'll hold you to that…

"I'm not sexist, I saw Mad Max!" What? I said HOLLYWOOD IS CHANGING and used Mad Max as an example.. Where did I mention me or my personal opinions anywhere in that paragraph? Twisting someones words is an awful debating technique.. It isn't just Mad Max though.. Both top movies last weekend were about female…

EXACTLY!! I am simply suggesting that people reserve judgment until the studio does release a statement or the movie synopsis is released.. I don't see how that makes me a MRA..

-sigh- I have never once defended ageism or men's rights in this argument not once.. Just proper justice procedure.. If I did defend it please feel free to copy and paste it and show me where I did..

Why is there a movie where Nick Cage hooks up with Jessica Biel? Like that would happen IRL..

How is arguing proper justice procedure promoting men's rights? I don't see the correlation. If you would actually read my points I never defend their action, only that their perspective isn't known.. If you have some insight on it, please enlighten me.

I thought you were calling me gross, and not because I can read, that is just how I read into it. That is my fault, not yours.. That being said what is so wrong with me saying that I will reserve judgement? I am not saying they are right for doing this, just that I am not going to judge them for it until I know the…

Well there is evidence that they are changing their opinion of it.. Or did you not watch Mad Max?

I simply was offended by you calling Lolita gross, the subject matter is gross, but me getting offended is my fault, sorry.

Well she could do you know her personally?

Prove* me wrong then, I'm open to it. So far I have only been given examples of Gyllnhaal's assumed intent.. She very well could be a moron..

Again you are giving her the benefit of a doubt.. You don't know what she did or what this movie is about.. If this were a court case it would be thrown out, because in this country you are innocent until PROVEN guilty, not the other way around.. You are assuming intent on both parties, if you don't recognize that you…

I do have a sense of logic, and it is illogical to automatically take one parties side when you only know that parties side of the story.. Grossly illogical. Don't try and make me seem like some sex offender because I used Lolita as an example. Lolita is a good movie about gross subject matter, and she would be too…

Hey I'm with you.. If the movie is about just any woman dating a 55 year old then yes this is sexist as hell. I am not giving anyone the benefit of a doubt though, only you are. You are giving her word the benefit of a doubt, I am simply reserving judgement until I know the entire story.

How do you know? There is no script, no one knows what this movie is about.. You're passing judgment based on hearsay without evidence..

Hey whether or not it is a joke it is still a valid point mate.. Should they have to change their character because someone older wants to play the role?

Just saying judgment without perspective is almost always wrong, as opinions change when perspective is introduced.