You’re joking right?

Your point is also just one massive assumption with nothing concrete to back it up. The evidence we do have is a video showing the pedestrian emerging from a dark roadway. That’s it.

Would it be physically possible to swerve at this distance? Yes. But you’re ignoring the time it takes to process the situation. Assuming that’s about 20 feet, the car would have covered that distance in about 1/3 of a second at the speed limit. According to a quick google human reaction time to visual stimulus is…

That’s a pretty massive assumption based on absolutely nothing.

The sensors arguably should have picked her up but I’m not going to blame the driver here. She was pretty much invisible to the human eye until about 20 feet. No way there was enough time for a response.

I think it was more the “gas the jews” part than the dog part that is upsetting people. It’s still dumb but that’s the part the court was focusing on.

I don’t think that’s true. The law simply says that someone can’t be denied service due to service dog. As long as the user received the same level of service as anyone else it’s fine. The only reason Uber has to apply that to each and every driver individually is because they don’t currently have any control over who…

Who should get credit for inventing something and who’s being copied are two different things. I never said Apple deserves credit for inventing the notch just like the Article didn’t say that. What Apple did was make it popular which is causing other Android manufacturers to follow their example.

My short football career ended before high school thank you very much.

You’re totally right. All these Android manufacturers are copying the phone that sold 50,000 units, not the phone that sold 50 million units. Because that makes sense.

Spoken like someone who wasn’t invited to the party.

Seems like there is some conflicting reports. ABC article is reporting that she was walking but their televised segment is calling her a bicyclist. Granted, she could have been walking a bike, but it’s hard to say at this point what happened.

One weird thing about the ABC videos, the damage appears to be the front wheel of the bicycle but if she was riding in the bike lane (and based on the damage to the Uber car) she would have been hit from behind.

Unless their role involves more than just being the emergency backup they shouldn’t be slower. Keep your foot on the brake and pretend you’re driving without actually touching anything.

I think like car crashes right now, it won’t be that simple. If the car goes haywire and flies off the road into a pedestrian then the blame likely lies with the manufacturer (I doubt it would ever end up with the programmer unless they were specifically changing something without the knowledge of their employer). If…

It’s used it OR knew about it OR believed you lost value when it was removed.

The pale blue dot is a famous picture from Voyager 1 (apparently taken at the request of Sagan). In the picture Earth is a tiny pale blue spec so I’m assuming on the book cover it’s one of those tiny dots in the background.

Because people love proving how “deep” they are. The movie is full of mainstream references and nostalgia and people love to let other people know how far above those things they are.

That’s no different than any other phone. Depending on the aspect ratio of the content, it’s going to be letterboxed or pillerboxed. With an OLED screen the bars are virtually invisible anyway.

If you get it, then why is it funny? No one is denying that Essential released a phone with a notch first. But there is zero doubt about who’s being copied here, it’s Apple.