Anything that threatens white supremacy in the slightest = a divisive concept.

To the tyrants, equality is tyranny. And make no mistake, these oppressive, racist white ‘leaders’ are tyrants.

It seems to be getting more popular to make laws deliberately vague so the text can be nominally neutral while the enforcement can be blatantly discriminatory.  IIRC there are even court cases establishing that “how a reasonable person would interpret” refers specifically to a plurality opinion among conservative white…

Imagine if they put the effort into fighting privilege that they have into fighting lessons on it. Yeah, I know, the whole point is to protect privilege by making it illegal to talk about it. 

Do they ever give any indication as to who, specifically, considers these concepts divisive? Or why it’s ONLY these concepts?

You “The Big Joker is the Guarantee Joker” nyuckas is wrong, wrong wrong. The Big Joker is the BIG. JOKER.