Glad that I'm not the only one who thinks that this was some stunning work. Creepy as hell? Yes. Seamless? Beautifully. Gonna go have nightmares now. Bai!
Glad that I'm not the only one who thinks that this was some stunning work. Creepy as hell? Yes. Seamless? Beautifully. Gonna go have nightmares now. Bai!
Congratulations.
There are, but it's on the dark net. You need a special browser and everything.
Oh those are the ones you place the heads of your fallen enemies on!
So, by hidden hard partying what do we mean? Like, secretly doing lines in the bathroom while they're at dinner? Or sneaking out after she falls asleep to go to bars with hotter, younger chicks? Or, like, touching butts with everyone else in town? Is it about scientology or something?
I DON'T UNDERSTAND.
Ugh, "haters," seriously? There's valid criticism of putting Kim Kardashian on the cover of Vogue that isn't rooted in racism or classism or slut-shaming.
Class is not just about wealth. And both Kanye and Kim Kardashian are in fact good examples of how just wealth itself doesn't get one into the "country club", so to speak.
I don't care if it's Kim Kardashian, Keira Knightley, Blake Lively, etc... The problem I have with Vogue is that it hardly (if ever) uses working models on covers.
Seriously, Lindy, what indeed is up with people acting like everyone didn't used to drink milk with dinner? "Milk or water" was totally a thing. In fact, it continues to be a thing in my house. I ask my 4 year old daughter that question every night.
I STILL DRINK MILK. I'm sort of self conscious about it, but I love it. I also grew up on a steady diet of skim.
I like them better than most wedding/engagement photos which I swear to god ALL LOOK THE SAME.
I'm so glad I don't have to sit in their living room pretending to like these.
What? I have a hard time believing you've watched more than 5 minutes of a Mad Men episode because they certainly depict the sexism and racism and overall ignorance that plagued the era/setting.
Man, it must be hard for you to go swimming, since you only ever scratch the surface.
Just because people do it doesn't mean it's a-ok.
That's why they translate so well to film. You cover the hundreds of descriptive pages with set design and costumes and turn it into a perfectly pleasant 11o minute movie. That being said, I think Thomas Hardy is far worse. I don't need to read 17 pages describing the heather in the fields. I know it's supposed to…
I have always wanted the book to end with Jane saying, "Excuse me but you can not crawl back to me now that your wife is dead and you are blind. I choose me! Frankly, I don't give a damn about your crap anymore."
Can we one-star an author's entire body of work? Because I kind of want to one-star Jane Austen for writing books that make me want to *cry* with boredom. I tried, you guys, I really tried. BUT NOTHING FUCKING HAPPENS EVER. I tried Pride and Prejudice three times and I think I couldn't get past page 100, because every…
Is it just me or is Jane Eyre a perfectly good book with the end pasted on? Like why doesn't he just **SPOILERS** die in the fucking fire with his stupid crazy wife and then Jane learns an important life lesson and goes and marries some other guy or maybe is a badass and solves mysteries?
"OK, GRENDEL." <—- gold.