Oh THANK GOD. I was so worried that it had been like 15 minutes since there was a Kotaku article about Amouranth. Finally! I was getting depressed not reading anything about her for so long.  Whew.

Guarantee it’s something simple like she signed a deal with some company but they weren’t cool with the porn. Or she’s just finally accepted there’s more future potential if she reimagines her content in a more brand friendly way instead of banking on desperate lonely dudes who apparently have never typed “busty…

Honestly, I find her hustle-and-grind content more unbearable than any of her "controversies". She worked hard for her money, and it sounds like she's thought about how she'll invest it, but why does she have to then talk about it on social media like it's something praiseworthy? Good for her, but it's not like what…

Well let’s assume she is going to go the LTT route, what exactly is she going to do to draw people into the legacy area? She has already branded her self as something to lust over rather than anything with real substance. If she is trying to move away from that how much of her paying audience do you think is going to…

Siragusa has acknowledged that “the whole hot girl thing obviously physically can’t last forever.”

Hey bro, I’m not the one misunderstanding her statement relative to what she is doing, you are.

I’m so sick of this person showing up on kotaku. 

Wut?

The ban history and reasons for bans. And just look at the content in her work - it has 0 content besides sexual content

God watching that video just made me rage.  What an entitled piece of shit.  “It’s not a camera, it’s a PHONE”  Yes, with a camera you asshole.

How many pieces about that one streamer with the fake mustache did Kotaku post? Even when the summary was often "we have no news on why he was banned". 

She mentioned it in the article above. Looks like it’s just another attention-grabbing stunt to attract viewers. Regardless of how actually malicious it was, she’s not a streamer that’s worth my time.

So there aren’t other examples?

I mean her response, in the article, is terrible and doesn’t address that she was filming complete strangers at the gym for the purpose of mocking their bodies. Never mind the fact that she herself has breast implants and heavily edits her photos. She’s an all-around garbage human being.

I’ll not pretend that I watch twitch enough to fully understand it or her specifically, or that I have a understanding of her social values.

But considering that she (and others) abused twitch’s messaging system to promote their 18+ content, clearly shows that there is at least a tendency to value money over anything…

I get why Kotaku and others may cover streamers

it seems a bit odd to pick a specific beat that she addressed in a pretty reasonable manner, at least to me.

The “it’s just a joke” defense doesn’t fly for most people anymore, and shouldn’t fly for her either.

This is my problem with most of their streamer coverage. It dedicates far too many words to people who are basically famous for being famous. At best, they serve as modern day Geisha (the real ones, not courtesans), though their tool kits seems more shallow in exchange for higher accessibility.

she’s fucking annoying. how stupid does she think the employees are? “I don’t have my camera” and even when they show her the live stream “yeah, but it’s not recording.” and when all else fails “you guys are affecting my career”. Just because people find you attractive and you deem yourself to be “popular” doesn’t…