“…the seller claims more than $7,000 in parts having gone into it over the course of the past seven years ownership”

You’re actually wrong. Loads of people have lost their jobs at Record companies because of piracy. I for one know many people that are jobless.

Some musicians are rich! Therefore all musicians are rich! So I can take take take whatever I want, they’re all rich millionaires! Mine mine mine. My free music! I wasn’t going to buy it anyway! Gimme gimme gimme! I’ll tweet about how much I love it! Get someone else to buy it! Free music for me not for thee!

Yes, let’s use the two of the top selling artists for an example, not the thousands of lower tier artists nobody has ever heard of. Look, I’m not here to debate whether or not artists are better off under the protective envelope of a label or whatever, just that it’s really disingenuous to claim that something can…

You mean charging people for things?

True. Ok how about this; this, Pollock then period rags.

That’s a bit harsh. A Jackson Pollock is only barely above putting a period rag on display, this at least is a couple of notches above the Pollock.

Slightly above putting period rags on display.