dabhidh--disqus
dabhidh
dabhidh--disqus

Well, I'm sorry my failure to find numbered lists to be fun annoys you so much. But don't worry on my account, I'm good.

Wyman's opinions are usually fun to read even if I don't agree with them but the very thought of, "I'm going to take an entire band's output and rank them by number," it just seems weird and discordant. It implies a sort of analytical approach that I don't think is entirely relevant in the realm of writing about

I love fun. I love music. Ranking songs on a numbered scale is neither fun nor music.

I can't think of a more vapid form of music journalism than ranking songs on a number scale. It's meaningless clickbait.

I wonder if there will even have to be another kaboom involved. Not only has Cersei succeeded in what Jaime prevented Aerys from doing, she also enabled the death of Jaime's last child. I wouldn't be surprised if one of the first things he does is to make an attempt on Cersei's life.

Her career is like, "Oh shit I'm going in the water again."

Yeah, I don't get that either. Say all ya want about Returns being a retread, it was a helluva lot better than Tomb Of The Dragon Emperor.

You could be right, and I am at a disadvantage since I jumped off the series about two seasons ago. I just think that the series started out with a particular story and a particular direction in which Emma was crucial, and when they throw that away, an important continuity is discarded, unless her story line is

Certainly it's damaging peoples' understanding of the source material. The first thing I thought when hearing that this new movie "sends up" the legend is that most people probably never heard or read or saw anything like the source material for the Arthur legend anyway, so they'll have no idea of what's being "sent

I loved this show up until the Frozen storyline appeared, which kinda sucks because I really looked forward to it - it was teased so perfectly. After that it just seemed boring and confused. And no, the series should NOT go on without Emma, that just trashes the whole premise of the show.

With all the pains taken to make spectacular comic book movies these days, and most of them becoming blockbusters, maybe it's time to stop trying a "gritty. worldly, 'realistic'" King Arthur movie and just go ahead and make a movie that tells the original legend (or at least one of the legends) with all the splendor

No, my comment was correct - she's not underdeveloped or unintelligent.

Well, unfortunately it looks as if Stark's "mentoring" is going to involve telling him not to do things and taking his suit away from him. So instead of being a helping hand, he's going to be an obstacle, which seems to be the role Tony Stark has been assuming for the last several years.

Y'know, the hell with Iron Man and the hell with making Spider-man dependent or subordinate to any other superhero. The idea that Tony Stark gave Spider-man his suit and can take it away from him makes me want to puke.

Well, if you were going for glib, you overreached.

This 24-second video doesn't celebrate anything as a virtue, it's just a little kid doing something cute. And there is no evidence that her brain is underdeveloped for her age or that she lacks intelligence. She lacks the knowledge to identify that the object is a water heater but that does not mean that she lacks

I was 13 when that show premiered and I hated it. It seemed part of a general trend in TV that made me walk away from TV almost entirely for more than a decade. It was just so contrived, but not in a clever way. The "titillating" aspect made it seem idiotic and childish. And Suzanne Somers made Farrah Fawcett look

It was really the functional equivalent of a Bond villain setting up an elaborate fatal trap for Bond and then either walking away or retreating to some remote area to watch the action. All this does is give Bond, or whoever, time in which to make the whole thing backfire. And emotion really is the fatal flaw in

Your point is entirely valid. I'm not comfortable in my appreciation of that episode but it is what it is. I suppose if Wood had just gone ahead and staked Spike I would have said, "Well, that's fair", but the whole luring him into a trap thing was foolish. Given his own spotty character, Spike was uncommonly generous

Wow. Best interview so far, hands down. Marsters is a cool, thoughtful guy. He really reminds me what a special character Spike was, and he's correct - he really got to do it all. Spike's not only the bad guy, sometimes he makes you root for the bad guy. The episode where he wipes the floor up with Principal Wood is