d-avid
d-avid
d-avid

Claude would fit more than Tommy Vercetti. He made an appearance as an adult in GTA:SA, which means he was at least 30-35 in 2001 and will be at least 40-45 in 2012, which fits.

Don't use IMAP for Gmail. Use Exchange. You can get push Gmail using that method but not IMAP.

As someone else mentioned, Tommy Vercetti would be over 60 in 2012, and the character doesn't look that old. But even if the middle aged white guy in the trailer isn't the narrator, the opening line, "Why did I move here? The weather ...", suggests that the narrator is from somewhere where the weather isn't that

I was thinking "the life" might have been Wall Street — thus the logo. The opening line of the trailer, "Why did I move here? The weather ...", also suggests that the character is from somewhere where the weather isn't that great, not Vice City, but maybe Liberty City.

Looks like it'll be a single city setting in Los Santos. Which is great. I hated how underdeveloped GTA:SA cities were, both geographically and culturally.

Yes, considering that the car license plates read "San Andreas" and the cop cars say "Los Santos."

It looks like an iPod touch, which has its headphone jack on the bottom.

I'm not saying that current speed limits are right or wrong, but how do we determine the "right" speed, anyway? It's just as arbitrary.

Could you please make a proper case rather than relying on a straw man argument? I don't see anyone here arguing that 55 mph on an empty highway is endangering anyone. If there's a low-traffic highway with a 55 mph speed limit, we can all agree that should be changed.

That's such a stupid thing to say. When the limit raises to 70, people will start going 75 and make the exact same argument. It's a hard limit for a reason. It seems arbitrary, but it's not. It's practical.

Exactly. I don't care if you're an amazing driver, but we're talking about a public road that everyone uses. The chance and severity of accidents are proportional to the speed of the cars. I don't know about you, but I'd much rather have people drive too slowly than too quickly.

Are you aware of the racial tension between Chinese and Malays in Malaysia? The government has historically passed laws discriminating against the Chinese? Oh, you're not? Well, it was reported in The Economist, so you should have known about it!

My generalizations are actually proven right everyday in the comments of Gizmodo, and particularly so on blogs like it (e.g. Engadget). Also, I'm not saying that Apple fanboys are morally superior to the average person, because they aren't. I'm saying that Android fanboys are morally inferior, because they feel the

"If someone doesn't understand the history of blackface, the way minstrel shows have been used to degrade and mock people of color, the centuries of colonization and slavery that came before, then yes, I suppose they might not understand the difference."

It's only a fact if you believe hardware, feature lists, and other on-paper facts make things good. Most people think how it actually works in practice makes it good.

Exactly.

That's because Apple users aren't like that.

I haven't seen a single Apple user do that. But in almost every Apple thread there is an Android user who does.

Um, because his full-time job now is his charitable foundation?

I believe the correct answer is: it was a joke.