cyberpizza
cyberpizza
cyberpizza

It baffles me how people can't understand that random and predetermined aren't mutually exclusive. Maybe there's an algorithm that uses the date to determine what he sells, or something like that. So yeah, it's predetermined, but not hand-picked. I'm not saying that's how it works, but people need to stop getting

Eh, it's 1 review each. Doesn't mean anything.

It's exactly the same as they were. If you liked them before, you'll like them now. I personally love it, and once you get past the annoying party system, I've only had technical problems once, and we're pretty sure it was due to my friend's crappy connection getting dropped while he was hosting the game.

I wholeheartedly agree with this. Every time this game is mentioned, there are a bunch of people saying "Pshh, people still play that game?". I haven't played consistently, but I go back for a few games every few weeks, and have always enjoyed it, and have never had any issues finding games.

Possibly, but I bet you can't do it without also shutting out the other streaming platform in question.

Why do people not understand that news on a local Fox affiliate is not "Fox News", the station?

I don't understand this theory. If you want to have a full set of raiders, show up with a full set of raiders. If you don't have enough, you're taking your chances getting a good group. The chance of a bad group isn't an excuse to not allow you to try.

I actually thought the overall storyline of this movie wasn't that great, but Simmons was absolutely incredible. Good movie, not great, but his performance is easily one of the best of the year.

Any chance you could add the prices along with the percentage discount? The list is awesome, but clicking into each one to view the price is kind of annoying. Thanks!

Any chance you could add the prices along with the percentage discount? The list is awesome, but clicking into each

Excellent argument. I'm glad you came to that conclusion without even trying to talk to me. Good talk.

I'm not discrediting people because they disagree with me. I'm just saying I think discrediting anything referred to as DLC because it's DLC is ignorant. Way to oversimplify what I said.

I hate this mindset. DLC can be awesome, it just depends on how it's done. No one complained about expansion packs back when they were the way to do this. It's just cool to complain about DLC. Using the DLC platform to add extra content to a game after release is perfectly fine, and anyone who complains just because

I agree with this. I played all the way through the expansion, and I thought it was fine, but it was nowhere near the game the original was. The complaints about the repetitive gameplay are valid, but the story just blew me away.

Dude, we get it, you don't like this deal. You also don't like Amazon deals and...maybe feel the need to promote Best Buy? I don't quite remember. Either way, we understand.

Good lord the condescension in your post makes me sick. If you don't like the game, don't like the game. That's fine, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. What you don't need to do is crap all over other people's fun because you feel like your tastes are so much more refined than theirs. The person that you felt

That's valid, but at that point the initial storming had already happened, which seems like the most dangerous part.

Please, elaborate on the "research" that the cops could do to differentiate between a bogus call and a real threat without going to check it out.

I guess I can see it interpreted 2 different ways, I'll give you that. I can see what you described, but I had to specifically look for it. Just watching it myself the first time, I saw a lot of those movements as simple attempts to control the ball, not conscious efforts to extend it towards the goal line, but I

I think you nailed it with the money-for-items thing. At least, that was my suspicion for why it's not allowed. They don't want an outside market for in-game items.

People keep saying that, but that's not what he did. Watch the video again. He never pulls it in and then extends it back out. He just catches it, stumbles forward, and loses it when it hits the ground. Should that be a catch, since he had possession as he stumbled? Yes. But the call was correct based on the stupid