It sounds like she’s positioning for a defamation lawsuit, which she’ll never file because it would mean that they’d have to prove that Barron isn’t autistic, plus they’d have to prove that the person who made the video did it with actual malice. Plus, the video would have to make a clear false claim, which as you…

Look, I think we can all agree the minor children of political figures should be off limits. But this wasn’t Rush Limbaugh mocking Chelsea Clinton. Or any of those racist pieces of garbage who made fun of Malia and Sasha. This was a misguided young man living with a disorder who thought he saw signs of the same…

Chelsea Clinton never threatened to sue anyone, either, despite the gross abuse she endured for years.

It’s what the Trumps do. Threaten to sue and since most people don’t have the resources to take on Trump and his team of lawyers they just kowtow to him.

Most of it by the voice of the moralistic right wing, while he was high on pills, Rush Limbaugh. Fuck that peice of shit to hell and back.

Michelle Obama and her children were being called monkeys, and people were calling for her (Muslim, socialist, non-citizen) husband to be lynched. Nary a lawsuit in sight. Chelsea Clinton was openly mocked for her looks. It is not appropriate for a first lady to sue in this circumstance. These people are ridiculous.

Where was the outrage and lawsuits when they were saying all kinds of vile crap about the Obama girls?

it’s sad when someone was using the video to defend Barron is threatened with a lawsuit. Also (1) the statements that Barron is “normal” (clapping-wise) and (2) the fact that they are willing to sue on this to defend Barron’s “normalcy” (which is what I got out of the article) is more disturbing — that autism is not…

Do you really think the other autistic kid posted this with the malicious intention the Trumps are portraying here? That doesn’t make much sense to me.

Isn’t it bullying to go after an autistic who meant well? How about you pretend to act like a real FLOTUS and do something about all the racist, sexist, and bigoted bullying your hubby and his neo-Nazis do.

This is why he never sues. Because he would be open to discovery. He throws out threats and that usually dose the trick.

“Sorry Barron, it sucks to be scrutinized for every little thing because your parent decided to run for President. But hey, at least you won’t have anyone on the left calling you the First Dog”

If the Trumps sue, then they’d be opening themselves up to discovery, right? What does that do to Barron’s privacy?

Has it occurred to her that it might help if her own husband stopped making fun of the disabled?

I live in Columbus. We have the second highest Somali population in the United States. If white people don’t have to claim responsibility for Dylan Roof or James Holmes or Robert Deer or any of the countless white people that commit violent crimes, they don’t have to either. This feels so raw to me, as I live about a…

Hey now, give more credit to middle age and elderly men too. They may not be as violent but they can still ruin stuff! Age is just a number!

This is literally the only story I have ever seen referring to a white Christian man as being “radicalized.” Most articles refuse to call Roof a terrorist, and ignore that he specifically wanted to kill Black people. So that’s nice, at least there is one.

“self-radicalized.”

Note to self: It’s not “self-radicalization” when American white nationalists kill people. Only when the guy is a non-white Muslim. I think I understand now.

That would make it a far more interesting movie than the trailer does. has chris pratt ever played a creepy character? Anything other than a hot, lovable doofus?