There’s a difference between thinking of something and bringing it up when you know it’s just a distraction.

Why are you giving me a history lesson on something I already know?

I’m familiar with the press releases and director comments. None of them say “This will be the first part of two parts and the second part will never come.”

None of what you just said speaks to anything about how the story might be told or retold.

Is it confirmed anywhere that only Whedon’s footage will be cut?

Why do you think that only additional footage could possibly make the film more stand-alone? Cutting footage can also accomplish it.

Isn’t that just more reason to speculate that the Snyder Cut will actually resolve a stand-alone story?

I respect all life, though I respect life that evolved on my home planet more.

The comics have done the same thing many, many times.

Do you know whether or not it’s a stand-alone story or one meant to be continued? Why are you assuming that there’s going to be a forever unresolved cliffhanger?

Murder is wrong no matter the victim.

No police department should ever have “shoot on sight” orders.

The sex scene is in the comic. What’s the issue?

Is something wrong with Wonder Woman holding heads? I was under the impression that Wonder Woman was a very violent character without the same anti-violent qualms held by Superman or Batman.

You sound like Harris or Warren demanding Sanders renounce his “Bernie Bros” over and over and over again.

I don’t think you “fundamentally” understand the thematic nature of the films considering you believe Lucas’s message constitutes Hitler apologia.

I never denied any of that. It’s a pretty obvious interpretation. My issue is that people are assuming it’s what Lucas himself intended rather than realizing that his message might have simply been lost in bad storytelling/dialogue.

I get the sense that Bazzd is also using Anakin as a “cipher” for their own “emotional relationship to the story and its particular events,” considering they’re so entirely certain of their particular interpretation.

You’re responding as if ComradeDread simply wanted to add his scene rather than also editing the rest of the script. I thought it went without saying that CD was suggesting a different theme rather than just one scene.

I never said that Greenwald was directly employed by the ACLU. Perhaps I should have used the term “alongside” rather than “with.”