People appreciate and enjoy it more now, but for the most part it hasn’t yet been seriously held as an underrated or especially innovative film.

It’s not so much “more than two genders” as it is a belief that the sexual dimorphism of the human male and female is more rooted in culture than actual biology, and thus so too is gender more a cultural construct.

Non-binary individuals typically feel they cannot be defined by gender, or beyond gender, though there…

Charles,

The word Latinx was originated by actual Latinx, not white people.

The “joke” is homophobic in much the same way it’s racist to whatabout “black-on-black” crime: it shifts the burden of guilt from the white or heteronormative hegemony that overwhelmingly holds sociopolitical and economic power and thus bears the greater burden.

It’s actually very easy to criticize both Trump and Putin without resorting to petty homophobic jokes.

It’s funny how Republicans managed to criticize Obama’s support for Putin and Russia as naive and weak rather than explicitly homosexual. Somehow homophobia was liberalism’s first reaction to a conservative continuing the same policy held by Obama prior.

It’s funny how Republicans managed to criticize Obama’s support for Putin and Russia as naive and weak rather than explicitly homosexual. Somehow homophobia was liberalism’s first reaction to a conservative continuing the same policy held by Obama prior.

The “joke” is attempting to get across a message that non-aggressive geopolitical negotiation between world leaders is tantamount to homosexuality, and that homosexuality can be reduced to only a sexual power-dynamic.

So you’re fine with the heteronormative, binary model of human sexuality in which one person is the “dominant” masculine while the other is the “submissive” feminine?

So, like Disney, it’s okay to code villains as queer simply because they’re villainous?

I am not taking Trump’s word on this any more than I am the American intelligence community. They willfully deceived the American public and the world regarding Iraq and alleged “Weapons of Mass Destruction,” and have lied about every major incident in American sociopolitical history throughout the last 100 years.…

The last 100 years of American history puts into question the credibility of the American intelligence community. They’re also proven liars.

“Conclusive report”? Just like the report provided by Bush, Powell, the C.I.A., and the media regarding Iraq and alleged “Weapons of Mass Destruction”?

Obama ingratiated himself to Putin and Russia far more than Trump does now, to the point that Republicans and even many Democrats would constantly cajole Obama as a naive and weak leader.

Since when has the F.B.I. ever told the truth, though? It’s not like they’re known as arbiters of justice, considering their role in both radicalizing potential domestic terrorists and in mass incarceration.

The film Sneakers begins with government surveillance and privacy violations against American citizens, but ends with the revelation that the C.I.A. desires a miraculous hacking device so they can surveill and essentially blackmail the F.B.I and Congress.

So, you’re placing full responsibility on Bush and Powell, and the CIA is completely 100% absolved? Are U.S. intelligence agencies only good when a Democrat is president or when they’re opposing the president of an opposing party?

If you truly believe that Trump, the Republican Party, and its voters have all committed treason then you’re in not so many words calling for their execution.

Did you believe Bush, Powell, and the media when they said there were “Weapons of Mass Destruction” in Iraq? Why should we believe the same government now when we still have not been provided evidence?