I'm really looking forward to driving one of these. I hate the new Cherokees when powered by the Tiger Shark engine and hope these are better.
I'm really looking forward to driving one of these. I hate the new Cherokees when powered by the Tiger Shark engine and hope these are better.
Worth every second! Nice writeup. Can't wait to go myself!
Nope. This picture had the wing on it though...
Issac Asimov already laid the ground work for this with the 3 Laws of Robotics... Hopefully Elon doesn't live up to his Bond Villian looks/lifestyle and helps to implement the 3 laws. Unless, he's donating to cover up SkyNet...
Almost died in one... As a passenger which is worse...
The Edmunds article is from 2011... The Ford Fusion article cites the same Car and Driver article... And the Ford Flex Forum is based off 19 votes with 32% reading accurate... *le sigh*
How much do YOU assume it to be off by? If everyone else has a hard time getting the truck to the EPA stated 25, what do you think it actually achieved? I'm not a large corporate magazine or website testing cars... I don't have a budget for this... So I should assume the Chrysler 200 I'm driving now that states I only…
I like the Martini better than the Gulf livery that I saw yesterday. I think it's just the addition of the wing though...
Yep. I was competing for Ford in an MPG challenge at the time. The girl who won averaged 33ish...
It's soooo high...
It was 2WD, Crewcab, XLT with the 3.5 EcoBoost.
Highway speed, hypermiling it... No A/C during the summer.. Not a lot of fun...
Not a huge fan of the aesthetics... It looks tall and narrow to me... Obviously the looks of any vehicle are moot because what looks great to someone else looks like vomit to me... Is this their shot at a millenial/guys in their 30's-40's that want to feel like they're millenials truck?
I had a EcoBoost F-150 when they first came out and was able to get up to 28-29 mpgs with that. I wonder what I could get the Ecodiesel to...