cstealth
cstealth
cstealth

hah they edited the original article that said it had over 500hp; apparently this one has 329hp.

Supercharger as in fast battery charging, not forced induction.

Because I think that someone spending over 70K is looking at this from a luxury point of view, whereas the Model 3 buyer will be looking at it from a value point of view.

Um but did you see the part where that $5,000 increase (on a model very few people were buying anyways) brought with a range increase, AWD, a second motor, over 200 more horsepower, navigation and a Supercharger?

What he means is that automakers don’t want to make more cars like this because they don’t sell well.

Is the Tesla stock?

Yeah, only dubstep-listening young’ins would find a colour like that desireable.

I think it’s only there to differentiate the mule from a regular Rolls.

And I hate it when the power locks button is on the centre console instead of the doors.

McLaren X-1:

Replace the headlights with LED headlights in the two side vents and you have a MEAN looking car.

The front looks derivative and the back looks ugly with all of the eye-shadowesque cladding.

Yeah, I prefer this quite a bit over the Viper/Ferrari/Camaro design they’re using now. I’d say the C7 is one of the uglier Corvettes GM has made.

It’s a decent design, but it is 8 years old.

Yeah, I thought Jalopnik put that there.

It looks exactly the same as the last generation which makes me think this is still basically the same as the Gen1 2008 Infiniti EX.

Seriously. How is this different than the EIGHT YEAR OLD Infiniti EX?

If you think that’s bad you should look at the X1 and the GLA...they’re marketed as SUVs yet if I’m not mistaken, the Honda Fit is taller than the GLA.

There are quite a few Juke fans on Jalopnik (and I’m not even talking about the Juke GT-R).

I think it was an unfairly maligned car, that could look good without the massive cladding: