Those ten guys (assuming they’re guys) might get mad and still have enough funds squirreled away to make some pretty nasty reprisals. Wouldn’t it be a lot safer to kill them (and their heirs) before the Great Taking?

So they’ll be held fully liable unaccountable for committing a violent crime possibly violating department policy?

One vote for every dollar of GDP. And one BONUS vote for every mile of ocean shoreline. End the corruption in 2020 once and for all!

From snowflake to snowstorm in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...

As long as you understand Trump sees the world solely from the perspective of Trump, he’s right. White nationalism is not a threat to Trump. (Quite the opposite.)

Another dyed-in-the-wombwool aristocrat.

It’s quite apparent that you don’t understand how xtianity really works.

Step right up, step right up, step right up, how do we do it, how do we do it, how do we do it. (With apologies to Tom Waits).

Stop me before the Muslims make me kill more Muslims again. No, don’t stop me. No, wait, what?

2.5 Ask the suspect if they have a copy of the constitution in the vehicle.

Funny how when these fucking stormtroopers break the law, it’s treated as a (possible) violation of department policy. On a good day, anyway.

Learn to do things on your own volition? You, know, without an electronic crutch? 

Threat or menace?

The enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend.

Love the idea of teaching the youngsters the pay-to-play nature of realpolitik.

You really opened my eyes on this one.

Might be a good idea to set a higher bar for “empowerment.” Like indictment.

Given the political gravity shifting that’s occurred over the last 2+ years, “neoliberal” and “neoconservative” are, for all practical purposes, indistinguishable. Since the latter has been associated with the oxymoronic concept of “compassionate conservatism”, neoliberal seems to provide better overall coverage for…

WTF is the least bit satisfying about it?