The enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend.

Love the idea of teaching the youngsters the pay-to-play nature of realpolitik.

You really opened my eyes on this one.

Might be a good idea to set a higher bar for “empowerment.” Like indictment.

Given the political gravity shifting that’s occurred over the last 2+ years, “neoliberal” and “neoconservative” are, for all practical purposes, indistinguishable. Since the latter has been associated with the oxymoronic concept of “compassionate conservatism”, neoliberal seems to provide better overall coverage for…

Making it illegal doesn’t solve the root cause problems of (a) gullibility, and (b) personal data collection. And who’s to say whether a “targeted” ad wouldn’t be legitimately well-received by some viewers?

WTF is the least bit satisfying about it?

a potentially embarrassing rebuke 

So Dems used to be bitter at Wisconsin, because they let themselves be duped by “Russian disinformation” instead of “DNC disinformation”? But you’re not now hehe?

Everyone believes false myths they want to believe.

In other words, her Appeasement Score is deplorably low.

Not necessarily. They do know where the big money comes from, though, as does Ms. Omar.

You can easily look him up. You’ll find a litany of white guy privilege (Harvard grad) with a sickening history of delivering pablum to the masses. Perfect fit for the job.

In Mr. Oppenheim’s business, that’s what’s known as “leaving money on the table.”

There’s no “learning” involved in any of this. It’s nothing more than a continuous tossing of feces against the media wall and seeing what the Cro-Magnon public will buy.

So they’ll be held accountable? Never mind, wrong country planet.

Of course they do. The Chinese pay a lot more.

Except in the new (and improved!) holocaust, the dead look a lot more like Palestinians than Jews.

Concentration camps were legally sanctioned in their respective jurisdictions.

What sovereign countries did you occupy?