Can we just have the Sergeant-at-Arms issue baseball bats to all the “representatives” as they enter the chamber?

I use the n-word all the time. And in a totally pejorative way.

The Dems: bound and determined to leave no stone unturned in the losing of the next Presidential election (again).

It doesn’t matter what it’s going to cost some hypothetical “taxpayers”. It’s going to cost the machine politicians in both parties (that is, the overwhelming majority of “representatives”) a shit ton of campaign contributions and cushy lobbying jobs after they finally leave office. And that’s all you need to know…

Surely the Dems can find a better ex-prosecutor to run for Prez than this. Oh wait ...

Since he hasn’t been indicted yet, that statement makes perfect sense.

Nothing can make every bad thing everybody else does ok like what-aboutism. Touché. You win the internet today.

Feinstein is a Democrat who absolutely sticks to her principle.

Your description of micro-segmentation is basically accurate. But your assumption that they don’t detect “Nazi vs. Non-Nazi” because they can’t is likely inaccurate.

Greed isn’t really the issue here

If it changes nothing, as history strongly suggests, then it doesn’t matter what century it happens in.

The DNC robots traditional, moderate Democrat candidates are merely reminding us of who they really work for.

As a condition of not getting their kneecaps busted.

Can we not just be excited that we have a growing field of extremely desirable candidates?

Thank goodness you have “Moscow” to blame. Otherwise, dems might have to be accountable for their own problems.

Nope. Didn’t vote for either.

The same folks who did it before.

First the Philippines manages to beat Amerika for the worst president award, now their whole country is in the running for the Darwin award. We keep lowering the bar, and they keep crawling under it!

Brings new meaning to “Anyone but HRC”. Blame anyone but HRC. 

I see what you did there.