That’s a thing, huh? This is what bored and/or shitty and/or underworked lawyers do. I figured, because that’s why I’m here.

The sixers and Brett Brown have no idea how to run an offense. Brett Brown has to be the worst coach at adjustments. When a mike fucking dantoni team out defends you, you got a big fucking coaching problem.

If this doesn’t constitute “continued vexatious litigation” I’m hard pressed to name something that does.

Stassa, you really have to look at the exchange surrounding Trump’s claim that he would speak under oath (emphasis mine):

Sadly half of those “American” things are made elsewhere. Only the baseball and the truck are American made products. Coors doesn’t count since it’s the canoe of beers. close to water.

American English translation:

The Oregonian used inappropriate terms in their reporting. Heimlich was handled as a juvenile. He did not “plead guilty,” rather he made an “admission.” He was not “convicted,” but rather “found within the jurisdiction” of the juvenile court. These terms are important because a juvenile adjudication is a lot…

This is the article that changed some of my views: http://www.economist.com/node/14164614

They be like, this is a witch hunt! And I’m like, well you’re a fuckin witch, so

As I listened I was wondering the very same thing. I know nothing of jurisprudence, but that DOJ attorney was dreadfully awkward and kept failing to offer even halfway intelligent rhetorical runarounds of the lame ‘the Prez says do it so we gotta do it’.

yes! me too!! my colleagues and I listened to the argument together and were pretty much freaking out with joy and pride.

You expect me to believe that a man who would punch a woman would also make a gay slur?

I mean it is the NCAA so amateurism is crucial

This is a day where I feel really proud to be a lawyer and part of the justice system.

That is basically how her father lost against Chirac several years ago.

Ok, time to start the True Blood viral ad backlash.