croquettecoquette
CroquetteCoquette
croquettecoquette

nice

Maybe the Warriors tried to lose the first two games but the Cavs were just that awful and had to give up in game 3 to get a five game series so they can win in Oakland.

The one stated in the above article, for one.

Sounds like Mutant League Football to me. I'm in.

Contractors should always be heavily incentivized starting from the rookie year and incentive payments should not count against the cap. That way you get players getting paid what they earn and not either significantly out playing a contracting or dropping production once they sign a big deal.

I like Sherman off the field, I dislike Sherman on the field. Apparently I also like his off field opinions and dislike his onfield opinions.

2. Organize events you can afford to do and invite them.

I would say the same to Roethlisberger for agreeing to appear on the show for exact opposite reasons. Can't imagine this will be swept under the rug in the locker room.

Yet there was nothing entertaining about watching them play last night.

They were always employees of ESPNs and contractual obligations moved them to ESPN.com after Grantland.com's demise.

Pretty much all of whom are marginalized to limited coverage or low viewership hours.

Didn't WADA or some other crappy governing body admit after the initial failed Ruskie tests that they did a poor job of handling the substance updates and testing?

I too thought the use of the word tribunal was odd. Maybe Tennis is some sci fi dystopian sport being played in the present.

Hey a player can totally suck and still be a hero. Ask Tim Tebow.

Can the Penguins unprotect Pascal Dupuis if he unretired for the sole purpose of the expansion draft?

Well he wasn't being a hero last week when he was sucking.

Are the ECHL/AHL/ETC farm squads built the same way?

Theoretically, every team leaves their highest paid players unprotected. The expansion team has to pick from that pool and it is impossible to have the 25 or whatever man roster under the cap. What then?

Wait, so for the 100th anniversary of a prestigious and historic South American tournament...they decided to play in the US?

So at WORST my favorite team can only lose up to two guys. Phew. Do teams receive any compensation in return, other than a contract off the books? Does new team have to fulfill existing contracts (ie, they can't get all the $$ guys because they need to fit under the cap? Can teams protect players based on who other