[citation needed]

This is just a corollary of the "friendzone" theory if you ask me. It's the hare-brained notion that women are obligated to look past a man's glaring flaws (whatever they are) and want to be with some guy because that guy is special or otherwise exceptional.

A+ for sweeping generalization effort!

*Statements not investigated by the FDA, results may vary

Exactly, despite the old myth that all supermodels really want it a nice average Joe who's a good listener, the reality is that most people wind up with someone who's attractiveness is equivalent the theirs.

Also, "I'm not 'super hot' but I want women who are 'super hot'. I get mad when women also place importance on physical appearance."

Sounds like a teenage platitude if you ask me.

Kind of telling who he used as his examples: Leno, Larry the Cable Guy, himself. Guess he figured he'd invalidate his thesis if he mentioned Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, or Craig Ferguson.

Oh my god, he is a serial rapist.

I'd describe it as this: For lots of guys, looks are the ONLY thing that matter; for most women, looks are ONE thing that matters. So there are a ton of guys that would date a woman who was not that nice, not that smart, had no job, etc. if she was really, really, hot, but for most women looks are one factor that may…

From another article:

When I was doing chat-based tech support, we had a male tech on our team with a first name that is generally considered female here in the States (think Kelly or Ashley). One day he came over to me with a funny look on his face and asked me, "Do you... /always/ get hit on when you're working?"

Unions and decent employment laws. Decent employment laws and a better fairer welfare state. I searched Product of the Welfare State and only found vile front pages of Daily Mail articles and far right Tea Party bullshit, so I give you this graph:

It's pretty rapey.

My comment on this is only partly related to this discussion. I just want to chime in my opinion about why women surpass men in education.

No, that's just what 3 butthurt guys said at one point, and Wikipedia quoted them.

The war on men is about the dumbest, most ridiculous so called "war" I have ever heard of. It is from those who think that for equality to exist, somebody has to lose. They simply cannot see a world where both can benefit, nor do they want to. These typically are the same types who seethe that black people aren't made…

I don't understand it either.

I think this article relies too heavily on stereotypes. Saying men can't/don't communicate well is simply false, especially when we see people who stop and pay attention when a man speaks but ignore or mock women when they're saying the same damn thing. Even if it weren't false, it wouldn't be all that relevant - if…