I’ve learned the hard way that following a pre-written adventure is a great way to lead to disaster. On more then one occasion I’ve had players figure out ways to beat encounters that were not even mentioned in the adventure booklet.

Well, I don’t think it is anyone’s place to tell another person what their aspirations should be. It’s like telling YouTube content creators to find a real job rather then continue doing what they love to do. And if they can find a way to profit from doing something they love, then what right does anyone else have for…

I think the real problem that Valve is having is that they are trying to moderate this system automatically through software instead of hiring more people to work out claims between modders. And I wouldn’t be surprised if they tried to come out with a copyright system simlar to the broken one used by YouTube.

Anyone else bothered by how awkwardly large the cockpit is? The paint job is nice, but I don’t think that is going to save how hilariously off the base model was to begin with.

This would only be better if they replaced all the main character’s dialog with dog sounds.

That ruling seems really bad in my opinion. It isn’t as if someone could just happen across a signal and instantly know what is being said. You need specific equipment to read that signal.

That’s my big concern. They are either fabricating evidence or covering up something illegal to gather said evidence.

One, I’m pretty sure that is illegal. You can’t spy on someone without some sort of warrant to do so in the first place. Two, police are actually trying to admit Stingray evidence in court. Meaning that they have been trying to use it for more then just getting tips for other evidence.

If they refuse disclose how the Stingrays work, how can anyone expect that the evidence they gather will be admissible in court?

The last movie I saw was Deadpool, $6 for the morning showing. So $50 is a bit less than 9 times the ticket rate, so I did math a little wrong there. But the point still stands. And this system only benefits people who go see movies in large groups. I usually see movies in groups of 3 or 4, and their $50 ticket would…

Nah, it just means I’m a more savvy consumer. There’s no good reason to pay almost 10 times the going ticket rate when they aren’t really providing you with much of a bonus for the higher price tag. It’s like they are charging you extra to not use any of the facilities that they have specifically built to view movies.

No, but you do have an option of not seeing the movie right away and waiting for a more economical option. The fact that you can see the movie a few months before the blu-ray does not justify the $50 price tag.

So you’re okay with them squeezing money out of you? They are basically charging you more money for less work on their part.

When you go to watch movies at a theater, you are not only paying to see the movie, but are paying for everything else as well. The huge projector, full surround sound system, the people who clean up everyone’s trash. They all are apart of that $6 ticket. You aren’t just paying to see the movie, you are paying to see…

Considering that you are paying $50 to see something once, when you can probably buy the blu-ray for half that price and see it as many times as you want. Yeah, I’d say it’s overpriced. Especially considering that you are the one that has to privide the hardware to watch the movie. You are basically paying for more an…

There is a difference between water-resistant and waterproof. One you can occasionally get get the phone wet and nothing happens. The other means you can take it diving with you. If someone is testing water-resistance by fully submerging the phone in water, they are doing it wrong.

You do realize that all of the latest iPhones run on the same software right? Meaning that if you make a key for one iPhone, that key can be used for others. They are effectively asking for a master key. Apple is having a hard enough time staying ahead of the curve as far as everyday hackers are concerned, imagine how…

Oh man, you just made me think up a possible freaky Star Trek episode. A Federation ship comes across a civilization that uses a replicator as a form of capital punishment. Where a convicted felon’s atoms are disassembled and then reused as the base materials to benefit society. Talk about a grim episode, especially…

I think we should find more of a problem that there is “outrage” over a children’s movie being marketed to a group that is widely thought of as being a sexual fetish group. Puritanical ‘Murika at its finest...and I’m firmly in the camp of “We shouldn’t care if Disney is marketing to Furries, or BDSM, or ScatSex…

Shouldn’t we not be using fingerprint locks anyways considering that a court could force you to unlock your device? At least with a simple password they can’t force you to unlock you device as that would be incriminating yourself.