crispyduck
crispyduck
crispyduck

Agree, not everyone wants to deal with the added headaches in exchange for some meh gains.

Sweet Jesus...I'm glad they kept it in partial shadow, what I CAN see is bad enough.

See this is what happens when you let marketing department interns do stuff without adult supervision.

All I heard while reading his article was:

Did you mean 240SX? Haven't seen too many riced out ZX's.

Plus, any seller that describes a problem using the words "easy/cheap fix", "don't have time", "would sell for twice the price if I fixed it" is full of shit.

Well, add $5k to the winning bid to pay for custom painted non-terrible body kit. Nostalgia's great when someone else is footing the bill.

Now playing

Formula 1 Honda V10...I just can't quit you.

Agree 100%

Eh, I work with an 81 year old 'legend' now. In fact when my current company hired me management thought all they had to do was stick us together on projects and a knowledge osmosis would just magically occur.

Man, you really had me riding high with the ridiculously awesome words that came out of Jennifer Aniston's selfish, childless lips...then brought me right back down to skid row with Kim's verbal diarrhea.

Fifty no's and a yes means yes!

Agree that it's not always defacto 'bad', but I've been in the audience for several presentations by perfectly competent women who completely undermined themselves by phrasing almost every statement as a question. It's distracting and for me personally the person ends up sounding unsure and unconvincing. I haven't

Confession: I'm from the Harrisburg area, although I don't hang out at Zembie's and can't corroborate the owners' hilariously dumb assertion of 'but we have black friends!'

"Let's stop telling women how to succeed in male-dominated businesses and start telling men how to not be dicks."

This popped up in my LinkedIn feed over the weekend, and I have to say I HATED IT.

Agree. However, I'd prefer "If it's raining or foggy turn your goddamn headlights on you thoughtless jerk!"

No, we should not, because when these sort of 'pre-screening' tests work they prevent the unnecessary amniocentesis. What we need to do 'while we're working on that' is ensure these new screening methods pass some sort of threshold test for quality (i.e. the FDA) before they're released for public use.