crispusattucks--disqus
crispusattucks
crispusattucks--disqus

I see GQ picked up this article. Goes to show there is always work for black people to say the things that white folks want to say and are scared to say.

Stop playing VSB. If Che didn't have the text yall would have been first to call for a boycott based on the word of a scorned white woman.

Of course, she could have been crazy AND he raped her. I willing to admit that is possible. But it is soo troubling to me that so many black people are unwilling to consider the possibility that he is telling the truth. Especially considering the facts of his case and the long history of brothers falsely accused in

I am a lawyer who read the trial transcripts and he did not get off on a technicality (BTW, what sort of "technicality" do you believe occurred that would allow a rapist to walk?).

No, it's the same thing if we believe what Nate Parker has maintained this entire time (and what a jury concluded as well), that is, that he was falsely accused of rape and it was another example of false arrest like mentioned above. But for some reason, the word of the accuser of this one white woman trumped the

You don't see the irony of this article in light of your other articles crucifying Nate Parker solely based on the uncorroborated claims of a clinically diagnosed delusional white woman?

I don't understand why folks can't accept the possibility that Nate has been telling the truth the whole time, the jury got it right, and he was actually the victim of being falsely accused of rape? Yall really can't take the word of three black men (I say three black men because even the dude who walked away and

The article is filed under "Nate Parker". Control F "Nate Parker".

Right because you have to be a misogynist to think that Nate Parker is innocent…like the almost all white jury found him. Jeez the Scottsboro Boys wouldn't have stood a chance if it was left up to people like you (which is was).

"To be clear, I’m not saying Nate Parker was guilty. I’m just saying that it would be prudent to apply the same skepticism of the criminal justice system when the possession of that skepticism is difficult to maintain. We just can’t dismiss those aforementioned not guilty verdicts as proof of a flawed system and then

At some point I thought characters were introduced to make fun of "two broke girls" and it's stock characters and the plan would be to kill them off immediately (dudes nose bleed and talking alot about death).

MY viewing of the ep was marred because I was afraid that they were introducing two new obnoxious permanent characters to the show.

This show has the sharpest comedic dialogue on TV. I've never thought having too many characters would be a problem but that's this shows problem (and the funny thing is that most of the characters are decent). Show seems to show an indecisiveness about not only what type of show it is going to be but even who is