@adpham001: Yep, works wonders.

@Hearthatvoiceagain: Haha. Good one.

Really? There comes a point where even if you can afford something like this, you shouldn't buy it.

@im2fools: Don't you mean you couldn't give a damn?

@dewa_sinting: Well reasoned and thought out.

@Wraith: Surprising, completely the opposite for me.

@Nw10jf: Cool. Different areas, different results.

@Nw10jf: AT&T does well in cities, but I want 3G service all across America, that includes rural areas.

@Wraith: But I am referring exactly to those "sticks." I need service in the backwoods of America because that is where I work and like to travel.

Got to admit, based on the few comments so far, AT&T did something. Now, about the rest of the country...

@seanklowe: Freud? Thought you were dead...

@techguy78: That is the subsidized price. The price without contract is $600.

@archercc: Use the IE tab extension for Chrome. That way you can browse in Chrome but test out IE stuff.

@xair: Every dog has its day. Apple will (is?) falling behind to HTC and Moto in terms of hardware.

BB walkie-talkie?

@MrCheatachu: I think he turned it over?

@Dirtypas: So you are saying that the fact that the fundamental purpose of a PHONE is hampered by poor design is not a big issue?

@gebinsk: That is until Android becomes so pervasive that no other alternative exist and it becomes stagnant. Hopefully software continues to progress nicely.

What unholy combo is this hipster-yuppie of which you speak?

I guess it's real then. 3D is here to stay. It will be in our movies, laptops, microwaves, cars, etc.