(cyclists) only follow the laws of traffic when it suits them
(cyclists) only follow the laws of traffic when it suits them
Voted for Leslie Herod, glad to see her leading on this.
And you keep posting the same lie, even after people call it out.
(The case was dismissed.)
Kristen didn’t translate the linked French article - there was no forfeiture (see my above comment).
It’s not civil asset forfeiture - the linked article (in French, probably why this article doesn’t correctly clarify) says the government of EG agreed to the sale of the cars as part of a larger international investigation involving assets in the Netherlands and the Cayman Islands. The process was concluded according…
Maybe he wants to still be alive in 6 months.
She didn’t recant anything.
Or better yet, wake me when Warren is the choice, and she picks Harris as her veep.
Ludicrously big reach to blame Harris for mass incarceration, a system which has been under construction for hundreds of years with the approval of both parties nearly the whole time. Even St. Bernard voted for the crime bill.
I don’t know if he drops out. He’s like a tick and won’t let go. Hopefully he tanks in the polls.
But I’m not going to pretend for one second that she actually believes in everything she’s pushing.
Agglutinative languages ftw.
I live in Belgium, so not really a concern for me. Sorry they don’t send them across the Atlantic!
“It’s only valid when MY team does it!”
This is why most people just buy Porsches. If I had the money and wanted something different, I’d buy an Alpine. I wouldn’t go near any Italian exotic.
My parents had one, called it the “Shove-It.” They never bought another American car again until a Tesla 3 last year.
It’s a valid tactic sometimes. Just not now.
Sanders just hand-waves away every time people ask how he’ll pass any of his proposals. Warren does her homework. I appreciate things about Sanders, but I vastly prefer Warren to him, regardless of age or gender.
He says he believes that “competition will create the glide path toward Medicare for All”—a wonder-inducing statement that seems to propose that private insurance companies will just happily, incrementally, wither away once individual “consumers” make the right choice.