Not to insult the Library of Congress, but ... you're using "simple" and "Congress" in the same sentence. This is the government; just be thankful that it works as well as it does.

Competitive gaming is the goofiest thing I have seen in my gaming career.

It's not a misspelling. It's a means of keeping the game out of search, since New Zealand is a test bed for iOS releases. If I search Dragon Quest on the NZ store, only the previously released game shows up.

And I said way TOO MANY make the list. Needs to be a cooling off period in the criteria to not make a mockery of it.

"Some games only make this list by virtue of still being pretty fresh.", clearly addressed.

Skies of Arcadia (Dreamcast)

Way too many games from 2012-2013... even if a sequel was in the works there wouldn't be enough time to announce work.

I preferred FO3 to NV, honestly - but, then, I went into both with a "Bethesda" mindset - looking for that open-world hiking simulator playground. FO:NV may have had better writing (in some ways) and a more complex quest structure, but it's world was less interesting to explore. /shrug

Oh man, those are some serious fighting words! Can you say a bit more? What did you like about Fallout 3/New Vegas specifically that you didn't see in the first two?

Nah, it was called Van Buren, and it would have been awesome.

Final Fantasy lurched to the side and fell in the dirt several years back.

Fortunately people can buy both, and yet people still irrationally hate players of games they don't like.

Look and sounds nice, but I prefer the 3D look of Bethesda's Fallout 3 much more than 1 & 2. Turn based combat games really don't appeal to me that much.

I just want Fallout 4.

Could the PS2 handle lots of people on the screen? Sure, could it make them look like this does even if you think it's not graphically impressive? Could it hell. This looks clearly better than anything the PS2 could handle.

Am I the only one who

They are probably not for you, remember not all gamed are for everyone.

(I would tell you that)

This is too much.