crazycrsx-old
crazycrsx
crazycrsx-old

Just imagine what could be done to a Hennessey Venom if a tuner like Hennessey got their hands on one ;)

Amazing. I got banned on Gizmodo by Sam Biddle because I (politely) disagreed with his (very long and frequently repeated) opinion that the Note and its users were stupid, and here we see it listed as tops. Its a refreshing breath of fresh air.

The biggest crime: the LEDs are FUCHSIA!

For an SUV it looks pretty good (although I also think the Cayenne and Q7 and X5 look good so you'll all probably disagree with me) and I know it'll sell like crazy, but I wish they'd make the Estoque instead.

Its Forza 4. I'm surprised there aren't many comments asking why GT isn't on there (maybe those guys are all busy buying Yaris's so they can paint there car a specific colour ;)). Going further OT but that paint chip system is about as dumb as it gets. Maybe if you could keep the chips there'd be some purpose, but as

I saw the cover photo as a thumbnail and quickly scrolled around looking for something talking about Aston Martin One-77...then I look up and see the Acura badge. I'm surprised a flagship car would so blatantly copy another company.

What I'm wondering is if there's a reason why the AMG M seems to be the vehicle of choice as opposed to other SUVs out there. I would think something bigger like a Jeep SRT8 or a pickup truck (Ram SRT10? :D) or a less powerful alternative like a Land/Range Rover....

I'm hoping I'm not the only one who keeps on reading the name of that Fiat as "Vaggio".

I see a bit of the Lexus GS grill in the lower part of the Citroen but I still think it looks great (and we're at the point where its almost impossible to not copy or be influenced be at least one other design). It looks like what Acura's designs would be if at least one of their designers was given the gift of

You know, that's actually a really good idea. Its basically like putting them in folders but they're all visible at once.

I don't really see anything too wrong with this....I would've worded it differently but I don't think this is all that bad. IMO its not even close to the PR disaster Honda had when they unveiled the CrossTard on Facebook and tried to convince everyone that it was the photographer that made the car ugly, not the

#9 should be #1. Nothing worse than going to a car show (mainly for new car shows, not so much for classic cars or modified cars) and seeing products of shitty parenting turning the wheel/playing with all the knobs and switches/changing the gears/etc. while you wait to try and actually look at a car you might be

It also reminds me of the Kia Forte (it was the firs car I thought of although now that I post the pic it doesn't look that similar...)

I used to be the a huge Honda/Acura fanboy but now I've completely flipped and have been fed up with everything they've come out with for years. It'll take them a long time to win back the fanbase they used to have, if ever.

Jaguar - just make something that looks exactly like the CX-16 concept and I'll sell whatever organs are needed to pay for one.

You don't sound like a "stereotypist", you sound like a racist.

"New Corolla only available in 3 shades of beige"

Its sad. I also feel like I'm one of a very small list of people who actually like Saab's recent designs.

Same here. There's been a lot of little things building up to this point, but after seeing the Note get bashed three times in 2 days and realizing there's no way a non-Apple product will get even remotely objective coverage, I'm out.

That's because most comments here are gushing over Apple products. So much so that when the iPad got a 4.5/5 star review, there were comments complaining that Gizmodo had an Anti-Apple bias.