But you’re automatically labeling the accuser guilty of lying/slander/ false reporting until proven innocent, then.
But you’re automatically labeling the accuser guilty of lying/slander/ false reporting until proven innocent, then.
I haven’t read the comic, so I don’t know what Maze is supposed to look like. But Brandt is just... like, unreasonably beautiful, and no TV executive worth their salt would cover her face more than momentarily.
Even Harmon hasn’t tried to tie his bad behavior to being on the spectrum. He’s been pretty up-front that it is his own personality/depression/substance issues that fueled most of it.
I’m a fan of Community and R&M, and it boggles me that people idolize Harmon or Rick. Harmon basically writes Rick as a parody of himself: a miserable, abusive, self-loathing asshole. He’s smart, and can throw out a good joke, but even he can’t stand himself, and should certainly not be idolized.
One thing I can say in Harmon’s favor (other than liking his work) is that he is aware that he’s an asshole and admits to it readily.
So he took like $17 from pretty cash?
“I’m not saying the accuser is lying”
Spanish is a gendered language. That’s how it works—nouns have genders. If you want a non- gendered word for Latino/Latina, why not just use Latin? It’s less stupid than Latinx.
No, no. Watch the first half of Explorers, then stop when they reach the alien ship and the movie turns to compete shit.
Don’t engage Mr. Obvious Troll. If he wants to troll, he should at least put some work into it. His post was just lazy.
As I recall the movie (and I admit my attention wandered) there were no actual mummies in it. Boutella played a lady with powers granted by a demonic Egyptian god. She was never killed or mummified, just locked up for thousands of years with a mercury IV. She gave Cruise some unkillableness and created a bunch of…
It is also just not the way Spanish works. I only took it in middle school, and even I know that. Gendered words are fundamental to the language. You can’t just jam an ‘X’ in and call it good.
Taxing, not confiscating. And the rich only get taxed (very, very lightly) on the wealth they aren’t able to hide, so light taxation on a small part of their actual wealth. Cry me a fucking river.
After Tom McParland’s article about sometimes having to be the voice of reason, I can’t help imagine that he should serve as a sort of sponsor for you when you’re looking at Craigslist.
“Give more money from the rich and they’ll distribute it to the rest of us” is a theory that has been tried before (trickle-down) and has never worked. The rich just keep the surplus and go on bitching about how unfair it is that they have to pay taxes at all.
The first one is a ton of fun. The second one is utter, utter trash. Do not inflict it on yourself.
Force Unleashed was a fantastic game. FU2 is aptly named, as its a giant middle finger to anyone who made the mistake of buying it. It was complete crap and it made sure there would be no third game.
I was so happy to see Mac’s shotgun axe go into the stash! He’s been taking a lot of crap in the future, and it’s good to see he’s going to be reunited with an old friend.
I don’t get what editing out a few disgraced sex offenders has to do with our bleak political and social state. They seem like very different issues to me, and worth very different amounts of worry.
I’m an uncle who got Battlefront II for my nephew. He really wants it, though... still plays what little single-player content there is in the original all the time. I wouldn’t have bought it for myself, but I’m not going to try to dissuade him.