And yet easiest of all is telling someone "stop making the art you like, and start making the art I like."

Well, wait, there is evidence that catering to female gamers doesn't increase sales, and that would be the poor sales figures for the games that catered specifically to female gamers.

Ok, but where are the threats and hate speech in the tweet you posted, or the video?

He did review the game, just not for Kotaku. Why do Gamergate opponents insist on lying about this? And we have no evidence that supports his timeline of the relationship.

Why couldn't you have a safe space that was safe from women? I don't get your objection.

Eh, hold up. I've read some of those boards and it's not just the regular MGTOW "women suck, or in my case don't" grousing; they do get pretty bad. I realize a lot of that is venting in a safe space that women aren't supposed to read, but they did read it, and the Wizard-chan ultravirgins did jack-all to try to stop…

"Excuse me waiter, this food you've brought me is rotten."

I don't know where you're getting that "things are good for me."

Well, she's actually still alive, but yeah - the double negative is meant to parallel the phrase in the post I'm replying to, but no doubt, it's clumsy.

You ascribe way more to OMG Colonimalism than can be supported, but yes, it's a different kettle of fish.

People can claim to be a part of GG without any consequences because there is no real way to denounce them.

Revealing his identity is doxxing, if he didn't want to have it revealed. (Quoting someone's address when they've already put it online themselves, on the other hand, isn't a dox.)

And where's the "hate speech"?

I'm covering for nothing. I'm challenging your claims. You've "got the logs"? Ok, then show me where the Wizardchan misogynists say they're starting Gamergate. Connect it in any way whatsoever.

It's not about your "ability" to criticize it. It's about whether the rest of us should pay any attention.

You're about to pretend that it always has to be someone's home address, aren't you?

In the whole thing? Because the story is a dox?

I'm not saying nobody should speak. I'd like Anita Sarkeesian to continue making videos, and receive Kickstarter or Patreon contributions if people like them. I'd also like her not to conflate "harassment" with "criticism", or tell me that my maleness is a performance that hurts other people.

Well, no, they don't. They tell us that some "Wizards" on an internet site got obsessed about who Zoe Quinn was sleeping with, once, and discovered a pattern of social closeness to a games journalist that more than bordered on unethical, given that he was a reviewer of at least one of her games (thought not, as it…

Well, obviously our modern math comes from modern mathematicians; of the greatest of those, the winners of the Fields Medal, only a single Muslim has ever won it in the entire history of the prize, starting in 1936. And that was last year's.