I wonder, had anything about the way we trade changed in the party thirty years? Something about high-volume trading? Like, how’s it’s possible, instead of being held up by the speed of human handwriting? And now we don’t trade by shouting in-person at exchanges anymore? That, probably. Whatever the things that do…

How does any of that not fall under the umbrella of “maintaining solidarity?” Your poor semantics aside, taking a job to fill in the gap during a strike is common and harmless. Taking a job doing the same thing for better pay somewhere else and keeping it, while banned as an overt goal under the Taft-Hartley Act (as…

“All candidates combined” is not the same thing as “any candidate.” None of those Gary Johnson ballots were “lost” Clinton votes.

Literally only the last one matters if there are consequences for crossing a picket line. There should be and usually are.

Oh, my God, we get it, you're the worst

Well, that’s all mathematically untrue. No state swung by a margin smaller than a third party candidate’s share of the vote. There was no spoiler effect in ‘16. The imaginary votes of people who didn’t cast ballots don’t count towards any particular candidate. Like, arithmetically. What else you got?

“Sanders/Trump/Russia?” Seriously? It’s that shit that’s gonna cost us 2020, not people failing to rally behind a candidate who hasn’t even announced yet.

Literally nobody is saying that

You know they've done it before, right? It only took 14 States to squeeze them in 1910

Yes, writing a response to you was all I did during *checks notes* the election

What’s so admirable about being a cokehead?

“Chooch?” You’re not good at trash talk. You’re almost as bad at it as you are at examining your own implicit biases ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh shiiiiiiiiittt in your FACE

You realize he represents South Carolina, right? The only people they let vote there aren’t bothered by this shit at all.

Hang on tho, that suit actually was terrible, let’s not downplay it like we have something to hide

Enemies of the world? What the fuck?

I’m not implying shit, I’m saying it quite directly, and clearly explaining my reasons for doing so. Your refusal to respond to or even acknowledge them speaks volumes.

“Hatch chickens from eggs? Great ideas, millennial, but everyone knows the chicken comes first.”

Do you still not get how’s it’s implicit in and, in fact, necessary to your complaint? That’d be hard to believe if you hadn’t actually, unironically, in real life, just gone with “there’s no difference between people I don’t like and the people who say there’s no difference between me and other people I don’t like”…

Marking “Facts over Feels!” on my angry moron bingo card

How did you get there from here? I’m listening to your points and telling you why I think they’re wrong. You’re anonymously cussing out anyone with the gall to question your authority on political communications. If anyone’s the troll here (and I do think you’re just using that word wrong) it sure ain’t me.