Those numbers aren’t as authoritative as you’d think. Even in a state as big as New York it’s really hard to design a representative sample and predict turnout during a primary. A lot of these last-minute decisions are made based on hunches or the numeromancy of respectably-styled fortune tellers, and the assumptions…

Go back to work, Elon

“Make weed"?

100% yes. Pathologizing shittiness is a slippery slope.

Do those ordinances establish death as a penalty for doing so?

PBS puts out three solid hours of almost obnoxiously unbiased reporting every weekday with a budget of ¢25 and some stamps. There’s shit for local coverage because most public television stations really do strain to get their BBC reruns to more than a few hundred thousand households, but in general it’s damn…

No, that's the ethical groundwork of the whole issue, dummy

What... What do you think irrelevant means? Do you think I took a while post to accuse the person I already disagree with ‘misguided’ or something?

So what do YOU think treason means? 

Ok, the word “cosplay” it’s gonna have to be Forbidden in 2019.

Not only is what you're saying irrelevant to the discussion, the two sentences in your post are irrelevant to each other. If you're trolling, good job excellent impression of a frustratingly stupid person, but shouldn't you be in school right now?

What does what you said have to do with the District Court’s decision in AFSCME v. Trump tho

Not everything, just the literal proceeds of crime. Go stick your slippery slope argument up your, uhh, slippery slope.

What the fuck are you talking about

Oh, my god. It’s the other way around. Your property rights require the denial of others people’s right to the enclosed commons at best and the fairly recent genocide of it's previous owners MOST OF THE TIME. You fucking dunce.

So, in the face of arguments against the continued used of national borders to restrict the movement of people and labor, you reply with “Build the wall! Build the wall! Because, uh, because it’s already there! So we need to build it to keep it there! Checkmate commies!”

You can think that, but also can’t for a second imagine it could apply to you. See what I'm getting at?

That is a bizarre reading of history. You blame the New Deal for Richard Nixon? And you think it’s fresher in people’s mind than the time that the Civil Rights Act was part of the larger Great Society program? You think nobody remembers liberals grabbing onto racism like their lives depended on it and riding it…

That’s literally silly

How... How can you explain all that and then immediately refer to property as a "right?" Cognitive dissonance much?