God, you’re fucking dumb. I’m not sure you even understand what a mortgage is.

If you think it’s natural for the value of money to... oh, right, you don’t actually know what currency manipulation is, because you’re a rube who turned all your savings into chickenwire and Disney Dollars

Why do people think having a single, volatile asset instead of a stable portfolio is an accomplishment just because you made that kind of mistake without even being able to blame it on encroaching senility like a normal? I’ll keep renting and growing my money, thanks, I plan to retire one day. (and also want to be…

Lol, hoarding is a constant issue actually, it just goes by names like The Paradox of Thrift or stagflation or credit crunch

Money can be backed by a bank instead of a government, indeed, that’s the very origin of money. Not a decantralized user network, tho. Not at all.

Nope, none of that is accurate, please Google “fractional reserve banking”

Duh

Because currency is a type of collateralized debt security and without a borrower of last resort to back those their value is too capricious for them to ever be practical as fungible units in finance or trade (a.k.a. the only two uses for money), among many, many other reasons.

Damn, those some extremely frictious transactions you’re describing. If only there were done type of commercial financial institution that was better at this you could use instead...

Oof, that’s a pretty stark portrayal of a deflationary trap. You don’t know how money works. Never try to manage more that $1000 on your own, ok bud?

Tragically, we can’t know that

Horseshoe theory is solipsism

 What? Because the existence of the state doesn’t preclude the possibility of liberty.

A successful revolution usually improves people’s living conditions petty quickly, actually. It’s protracted civil war than can cause some temporary hardship, but that’s hardly a given after an uprising.

 It’s not exactly behind the scenes, tho

Yeah, that’s a big part of what the local third parties movement has to quirk towards, but he’s right, they’ll never succeed without allies at the federal level.

 You should read the article, it’s a pretty good explanation of why and how the people you’re talking about actually do reject the ideas you think they secretly hold.

 Hey, now. America has often had a one-party system. You can’t make an ought from an is.

A one-party system would accomplish everything you just described more fairly and efficiently than ours does. Why half-ass it?

Then you must know some really slick shoplifters