Look, it's not like anybody's saying they're not allowed to. It's just a terrible business decision to try and push your faith on your patrons. They tend to be resentful of it.

Nobody with such a casual attachment to the place seems to have been involved.

They are in pain, they are scared, they are being sexually violated. Just because they can't put their pain in words, doesn't mean it isn't rape.

Can't get an "ought" from an "is," homie.

Don't forget, there have always been people who ate little or no meat at all throughout human history. They were called peasants, and they had a life expectancy of about 26. Vegans would have everyone who isn't rich enough to eat an enormously varied (and therefore environmentally destructive) plant-based diet…

It's an analogy. Hasn't anyone ever heard of using an analogy between two things that are structurally similar?

Sure, people probably said the same about those against slavery and treating women like property at the time, but they were TOTALLY DIFFERENT, okay?

Yeah, who the fuck wants to know how the patrons of your business feel about it? It's not like you even need their money anyway! Up yours, customer!

Regulars at that restaurant would be invested in it, and they are, imo, also stakeholders in the venture, but not the ones tasked with creating the menu, so I'm already boring myself forming an opinion about this

For too long popular feminism has been more concerned with it's image and "collecting members" than real action.

Oh, shit, you just came up with a perfect name for like half of the people I hung out with in college, thank you!

Even outside of feminism entirely, brag-y "I know precisely what you want and how to give it to you!"-types tend to be those who end up on the wrong side of the line in all sorts of situations.

LALALALA DIDN'T HAPPEN I CAN'T HEAR YOU

That requires 52 AGs to move as one. It's doable, but I wouldn't be optimistic about that strategy.

Ooooor we could just put Dietary Supplements, whose proponents claim are both Food and Drugs, under the administration of the, you know, Food and Drug Administration. Or something.

Because there's no law against it and they know we don't assign Upton Sinclair in High School anymore (because communism in both cases, obviously).

Yeah, just because Brady is statistically better and has more overall wins doesn't mean he's better or anything.

I think almost by definition, no, the disorder is characterized by the belief that their disordered eating is in fact "better" than a normal diet in some way- healthier for them, kinder to animals, whatever.

I've heard this line, and I'd like to say something similar to it, but literally this line from a frightening number of people.

SUCH WIGS