Counter-counterpoint: that is stupid. This is a steal for the Thunder.

Redneck from philly....

Explain to me why that is. Explain to me why the team that lost to the Cavs this year, and probably would have lost last year if Irving and love had played, is clearly better than them? The only reason to think so is regular season record. But, again: Irving missed the first 24 games, and still wasn’t right when he…

Are you being facetious?

None of those fouls on Curry were curious. Go watch them again. Every one was a blatant, legitimate foul. He swipes at the ball constantly. He often hits somebody and commits a foul when doing so. They finally started calling it, like they should have been all year. He committed every one of those 6 fouls. Not to…

InfinityAero’s reply is even more stupid, somehow. Let’s all ridicule him next!

Shut up, moron. You mean the suspension on a dude who hit deliberately hit people in the nuts 4 times in the span of a couple weeks and who very easily could have been suspended earlier? That wasn’t a valid suspension? Get fucking real, jackass.

I was with you until the stupid comment about the refs/league office. What they shouldn’t suspend somebody for repeatedly hitting people in the dick? That was the fourth time he had done so in the playoffs. If anything, he deserved to be suspended earlier.

Curry is closer to an average defender? Is that why the main offensive philosophy for the Cavs was “get steph switched onto somebody, then abuse him?"

But, you’re missing the point. If the finals aren’t an indicator, why is the regular season record? The Warriors were playing balls to the wall in a conscious effort to break the record. The Cavs had two of their top three coming back from major injuries, then had to go through a coaching change. So why is regular…

“They are very clearly less good.”

Congratulations. Single dumbest comment posted on the internet so far about the Finals. No easy task!

I’m going to go out on a limb and say that the gameplan was probably “everyone just space the floor, be ready for an open 3, and let lebron and kyrie take over.” It’s not like they're just bad players who werent good enough to make anything happen, so those two had no choice but to take over. It’s what the Cavs…

Hmm. Bogut didn’t get injured until the 4th quarter of game 5. You know, the one where Irving and Lebron both went for 41? I don’t know what your definition of blowing the fuck up is, but I think that qualifies. So unless they scored the vast majority of those 82 points in the waning minutes, I would say they blew the…

Also, the idea that it was reasonable to think the Cavs would be better off without Irving is just....well, stupid. Very, very stupid. I love Delly as much as anybody, but goodness gracious.... look up some statistics. Look at the Cavs +/- with and without Irving. The idea that they were ever or would be better…

“Curry is better than Irving at every other facet.”

Definitely better? That’s a silly thing to say. I watched Jordan throughout his whole career and I’ve watched Lebron his whole career. nobody who saw both play can say Jordan was “definitely better.” I’m guessing you didn’t actually watch the NBA during the Jordan years, and are just going by his legend?

No. Nothing like that at all, dummy. Pittsburgh has won numerous championships in recent years, and many more before that. This is a city that had been waiting over 50 years for a championship, full of people who firmly believed they would never get to see one of their own teams hoist a trophy.

No. No they won’t. The DS came out shortly before the Wii and was a huge sucdess. You have no idea what you’re talking about.

This is a painfully stupid comment. Do you not actually know what stockholm syndrome is, or are you just willfully stupid?