I love pauladeenridingthings.com

Hahaha, that version pops into my head more often than the original Sinatra. Classic.

That was hilarious. Thank you.

Oh, man, these are all brilliant.

I hope wheel never see the end of him.

If Microsoft didn't have their points currency, then the 360 version would have cost the same as the PS3 one. I kind of wish they would just cut out the middleman and label everything with real money prices.

I see what you're saying. If you give them an inch, they'll take a mile. That's how I kind of view the recent trend in less favorable DLC practices.

Blegh. My friends and I ate at Quick once when we visited Paris. Unfortunately, we were cheap/frugal college students and didn't know where to find affordable French cuisine, and for that the experience has been burned into our memories. My advice is to avoid at all costs.

There's hate for Flo? I love Flo!

Is a three-dollar difference really that big of a deal for the customer? I know that keeping it in single digits makes it seem more affordable (like when retailers so often price products at say $99.99 instead of outright saying that it's $100), but I wouldn't mind paying 13 bucks for it. I can only speak for myself…

Why is this the first I've heard of this game? I must have missed something. It looks interesting.

Ha, I like that you have fireworks in place of the chrome or whatever that was on the cover of the DMC collection. :)

Thanks for the excerpt; that was great. :) I'm sure my editions must have had a foreword, but I guess I skipped it. :( It's been so long since I last read them, and I'm long overdue. Hopefully I can get at them soon. If there is foreword, then I look forward to reading what else he had to say.

Haha, sorry, not familiar.

I remember watching some of the extra material in my LotR DVDs, and in the features on Tolkien himself, they said that he did not intend the story to be allegorical at all. If I recall correctly, he actually really disliked that people kept trying to find some deeper meaning or allegory in it.

He's discrediting the part of the dialogue that itself dismisses one half of the dialogue and strays from the point. And he says why.

Frankly, I don't get all of the complaints and lamentations about these kinds of articles being on Kotaku. Just like the "How is this related to gaming?" articles, you don't have to read these articles either.

But the point is that the arguments he's deconstructing are pretty weak, too. He's trying to shed some light on why they don't work.

Bummer! It's just a nice little finale. I'm sure you could find it on YouTube.

Ha, so do I. I'm a Benny Southstreet fan myself.