That's not refuting my response though...

Rumor is just that, a rumor. Porsche is not as dumb as BMW to make stupid products like the 4/6 GC.

Even if it were true that the 981's share their platforms with 991, that would still make 4 distinct platforms(ignoring the 918), not "10 different sizes".

Paint to sample for the OUTSIDE of the car(yes the shiny metal part) costs 5k. Check your facts again. I'd know because I'm seriously thinking of going that route so...

And yet all 16 911 variants(yeah you're really exaggerating) sell quite well to be worth Porsche to keep around.

The first gen cost ~50k in todays' money, which is the current base boxster's MSRP. Inflation!!

Well for the most part greater Taipei(not the new Taipei city, that crap the moron President Ma came up with) is pretty well covered when we take both MRT and the buses into account. I think it's more of a culture thing, where Japanese are not as inclined to screw everyone else over with their need of…

NO. Did you even bothered to look up the price on google? 944 in 1986 is 20k-30k. http://www.caranddriver.com/features/1986-…

Inflation. It's cheaper now than it was back in 1997, adjusting for inflation. 45k in 1997 is 66k in today's money. Base boxster starts at 50k today. So it's actually 15k cheaper. Some people still think money is somehow worth the same today as it was 17 years ago. IT DOESN'T. Is it that hard to comprehend? And this…

Inflation. It's cheaper now than it was back in 1997, adjusting for inflation. 45k in 1997 is 66k in today's money. Base boxster starts at 50k today. So it's actually 15k cheaper. Some people still think money is somehow worth the same today as it was 17 years ago. IT DOESN'T. Is it that hard to comprehend? And this…

Cool thanks for the info. Another project for me to do when I'm sorta bored :P

In general public transit (specifically MRT) is already widely used by commuters, but I guess there are still a lot of people who don't want to leave personal transportation behind, a la people living in Tokyo. Chalk it up to different culture and the lack of will to think of the bigger picture. Then again, not a lot…

Hmm. Can't comment on build quality, but I do know the last time I test drove a G37S manual, the seats were freakish hard(and I'm someone who likes firm seats in my car) and the entire time I just wanted to end the drive early so my thighs weren't going to have spasms because of being pressed on something that felt…

No they're not. Go check the weight on BMWUSA again. The new M3 is 3540lbs(manual), the M235i is 3505lbs(manual). The M3 is just slightly heavier than the M235i, it's NOT lighter by 200lbs.

No they're not. Go check the weight on BMWUSA again. The new M3 is 3540lbs(manual), the M235i is 3505lbs(manual). The M3 is just slightly heavier than the M235i, it's NOT lighter by 200lbs.

That part about hating a car because your former boss that you didn't like drove one is really non-sense. Now if you don't think too much of G35/37 because they have vacuum-sounding exhaust then I can completely understand. That and the new Q60 is just rubbish :P

Like 12/19 with the older auto, 13/19 with the MCT. That city rating is truly bad LOL Heck the 911 turbo S makes more power and gets 17/24!

Can't reason with a stubborn dude. Just sayin' if I don't care for the mpg(not the price part, just the annoyance of filling up so often) I'd have a C63 already.

Don't care for a guy that's not even an editor here. Go Vettel.

It's straight only compared to the M3, but it's really not as bad as they make it out to be. Haha but I get what you sayin' about Jalop doing a bit of a disservice to this car. My only gripe with the C63 is it's stupidly fuel thirsty. Even buying used I still can't stand the fact that I need to fuel up so freakin…