crackerjacktype0
Crackerjacktype0
crackerjacktype0

Where's the pic of the belted toilet seat?

Well I think they weren't as leery of brand cheapening back then as they are now. I dunno, I guess SUV and 2 seater are just viewed differently by Porsche in terms of brand image, as in one going down in price/class would have less damaging effect/more acceptable compared to the other.

It's a private jet. My absolutely uninformed assumption is private jet flyers/airline owners make the money per flight/booking(whole plane is rented out, why does it matter there's one less seat) and that seat being there or not is really a moot point.

All IMO of course so...People expect the cheap 2-seater to start in the low 30s, whereas this will start in the 40s. That there is the difference. If the 2-seater were priced in the 40s, I doubt there would be that many people jumping to the chance to buy one over the boxster. If they sell the car for 30k+, then it

I was very fond of the Mk3s, especially with the presence of the corrado. Too bade now they make mostly bleh cars, with the exception of the Golf R.

No. The HPFP issue remained with the N55, since the fuel pump itself was most likely not redesigned when BMW switched from N54 to N55, even with multiple manufacturer switch. The HPFP problem only went away when F30 was introduced. Most likely there was an actual redesign of the HPFP with the transition to the new

shares the platform with Q5(MLB), but Tiguan is on a different chassis altogether, one rung down, on the PQ35.

As a Porsche guy I would not bother with a sub-boxster 2-seater, since it's only going to cheapen the entire brand. This serves its purpose, which is to cater to those who want/need a Porsche designed vehicle that they can take to the slopes and have very good on-road handling, but is smaller than the Cayenne. I for

The Macan doesn't look as squashed over the second row, so hopefully it has decent headroom, unlike the dwarf accommodation in the X6.

I for one am looking forward to picking this up, as it should be more reliable than the Q5, and is just as capable as the X3 without the infuriating shifter stick thing.

Destroying other people's car because you hate it?....Okay then.

AND I skimmed through the text too apparently missing that. Yes RTFA :P

You didn't do it right. The very last enhance has to be crystal clear, not super blurry LOL

Whoops didn't look at the tiny text below the logo. Flame away :D

Well my impression is the contrast is best when the carvings are all the way through the skin/meat, not just the skin. Besides, it just looks much nicer when it's all the way through....with just skin removed it looks more half-assed. IMO of course :P

It's still technically weeks after watch dogs LOL

Got it. I wasn't offended by your previous comment so that's fine Mike :) Whoever came up with the idea of Drive sure makes our lives as Jalops/car nuts that much better. I understand about the whole /Drive channel being a team effort. That even though Chris is the one who gets all the praise, lots of other people, of

Pretty sure that Abarth logo cannot be carved into a real pumpkin as is. The black area above the top of the scorpion is completely separated from the outside of the logo, not to mention the bottom, as well as the area around the word "abarth". So unless you have a way of suspending those pieces from the back, there's

Okay understood Mike. Thanks for responding. But I agree with what J-Tenno said about Chris' videos being the most enjoyable to watch, that they would be even more enjoyable if they're longer. Eyesight be damned of course :D

If the video is only 10 minutes long, by the most conservative estimate it doesn't take more than a couple of full work days to get the desired footages. Editing 10 minutes of video shouldn't take more than a day, worst case. So I'm not too convinced why it cannot be longer.